Early Orthopedic Treatment of a Class II Adolescent Patient with Maxillary Excess Using a High Pull Headgear and Expansion Appliances

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-252
Author(s):  
In A Hwang
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
Mohd Zambri Mohamed Makhbul ◽  
Wan Nurazreena Wan Hassan

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3806
Author(s):  
Darius Bidjan ◽  
Rahel Sallmann ◽  
Theodore Eliades ◽  
Spyridon N. Papageorgiou

Aim of this systematic review was to assess the effects of orthopedic treatment for Class II malocclusion with Functional Appliances (FAs) on the dimensions of the upper airways. Eight databases were searched up to October 2020 for randomized or nonrandomized clinical studies on FA treatment of Class II patients with untreated control groups. After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment according to Cochrane guidelines, random effects meta-analyses of mean differences (MDs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed, followed by subgroup/meta-regression analyses and assessment of the quality of evidence. A total of 20 nonrandomized clinical studies (4 prospective/16 retrospective) including 969 patients (47.9% male; mean age 10.9 years) were identified. Orthopedic treatment with FAs was associated with increased oropharynx volume (MD = 2356.14 mm3; 95% CI = 1276.36 to 3435.92 mm3; p < 0.001) compared to natural growth. Additionally, significant increases in nasopharynx volume, minimal constricted axial area of pharyngeal airway, and airway were seen, while removable FAs showed considerably greater effects than fixed FAs (p = 0.04). Finally, patient age and treatment duration had a significant influence in the effect of FAs on airways, as had baseline matching and sample size adequacy. Clinical evidence on orthopedic Class II treatment with FAs is associated with increased upper airway dimensions. However, the quality of evidence is very low due to methodological issues of existing studies, while the clinical relevance of increases in airway dimensions remains unclear.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 351
Author(s):  
LuizRenato Paranhos ◽  
Eduardo de Novaes Benedicto ◽  
AdilsonLuiz Ramos

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-127
Author(s):  
Fulya Ozdemir ◽  
Volkan Osman Uyar ◽  
Feyza Ulkur
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
Dhaval Ranjitbhai Lekhadia ◽  
Gautham Hegde

ABSTRACT This case report describes the orthodontic and orthopedic treatment of an 18-year-old male patient who presented with prognathic maxilla, deep bite, low mandibular plane angle, and proclined incisors. Modified three-piece base arch was used for the intrusion and retraction of maxillary incisor. En masse retraction was achieved in 6 months. Reduced time for retraction was attributed to a single stage of retraction unlike Burstone three-piece intrusion base arch where canines are individually retracted followed by retraction of incisors. A modified utility arch was used in lower arch followed by a continuous archwire technique. The case was finished using bite settling elastics on a continuous archwire. The step between canine and premolar was corrected in the finishing phase of treatment. The final treatment outcomes were satisfactory and true intrusion was achieved with proper selection of biomechanics. How to cite this article Lekhadia DR, Hegde G. A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case. Int J Experiment Dent Sci 2017;6(1):26-32.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document