scholarly journals Novel Functional MRI Task for Studying the Neural Correlates of Upper Limb Tremor

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederique M. C. Boonstra ◽  
Thushara Perera ◽  
Gustavo Noffs ◽  
Cassandra Marotta ◽  
Adam P. Vogel ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis-Alberto Casado-Aranda ◽  
Juan Sánchez-Fernández ◽  
Francisco J. Montoro-Ríos

2021 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 117667
Author(s):  
Claudio Cordani ◽  
Paola Valsasina ◽  
Alessandro Meani ◽  
Elisabetta Pagani ◽  
Tetsu Morozumi ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 403 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 46-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feiyan Chen ◽  
Zhenghui Hu ◽  
Xiaohu Zhao ◽  
Rui Wang ◽  
Zhenyan Yang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 263310552095763
Author(s):  
Hongbo Yu ◽  
Leonie Koban ◽  
Molly J. Crockett ◽  
Xiaolin Zhou ◽  
Tor D. Wager

Guilt is a quintessential emotion in interpersonal interactions and moral cognition. Detecting the presence and measuring the intensity of guilt-related neurocognitive processes is crucial to understanding the mechanisms of social and moral phenomena. Existing neuroscience research on guilt has been focused on the neural correlates of guilt states induced by various types of stimuli. While valuable in their own right, these studies have not provided a sensitive and specific bio-marker of guilt suitable for use as an indicator of guilt-related neurocognitive processes in novel experimental settings. In a recent study, we identified a distributed Guilt-Related Brain Signature (GRBS) based on 2 independent functional MRI datasets. We demonstrated the sensitivity of GRBS in detecting a critical cognitive antecedent of guilt, namely one’s responsibility in causing harm to another person, across participant populations from 2 distinct cultures (ie, Chinese and Swiss). We also showed that the sensitivity of GRBS did not generalize to other types of negative affective states (eg, physical and vicarious pain). In this commentary, we discuss the relevance of guilt in the broader scope of social and moral phenomena, and discuss how guilt-related biomarkers can be useful in understanding their psychological and neurocognitive mechanisms underlying these phenomena.


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Sekiguchi ◽  
Motoaki Sugiura ◽  
Satoru Yokoyama ◽  
Yuko Sassa ◽  
Kaoru Horie ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1033-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiaozhen Chen ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Haifeng Hou ◽  
Fenglei Du ◽  
Shuang Wu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 691-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Boccuni ◽  
Sarah Meyer ◽  
Simon S. Kessner ◽  
Nele De Bruyn ◽  
Bea Essers ◽  
...  

Background. Proportional motor recovery in the upper limb has been investigated, indicating about 70% of the potential for recovery of motor impairment within the first months poststroke. Objective. To investigate whether the proportional recovery rule is applicable for upper-limb somatosensory impairment and to study underlying neural correlates of impairment and outcome at 6 months. Methods. A total of 32 patients were evaluated at 4 to 7 days and 6 months using the Erasmus MC modification of the revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (NSA) for impairment of (1) somatosensory perception (exteroception) and (2) passive somatosensory processing (sharp/blunt discrimination and proprioception); (3) active somatosensory processing was evaluated using the stereognosis component of the NSA. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained within 1 week poststroke, from which lesion load (LL) was calculated for key somatosensory tracts. Results. Somatosensory perception fully recovered within 6 months. Passive and active somatosensory processing showed proportional recovery of 86% (95% CI = 79%-93%) and 69% (95% CI = 49%-89%), respectively. Patients with somatosensory impairment at 4 to 7 days showed significantly greater thalamocortical and insulo-opercular tracts (TCT and IOT) LL ( P < .05) in comparison to patients without impairment. Sensorimotor tract disruption at 4 to 7 days did not provide significant contribution above somatosensory processing score at 4 to 7 days when predicting somatosensory processing outcome at 6 months. Conclusions. Our sample of stroke patients assessed early showed full somatosensory perception but proportional passive and active somatosensory processing recovery. Disruption of both the TCT and IOT early after stroke appears to be a factor associated with somatosensory impairment but not outcome.


2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
V. Kumari ◽  
W. Soni ◽  
G.D. Honey ◽  
S.C.R. Williams ◽  
N. Vythelingum ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Neufeld ◽  
C. Sinke ◽  
W. Dillo ◽  
H.M. Emrich ◽  
G.R. Szycik ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document