scholarly journals Mirror neuron activity is no proof for action understanding

Author(s):  
Alina Steinhorst ◽  
Joachim Funke
2021 ◽  
pp. 174569162199063
Author(s):  
Cecilia Heyes ◽  
Caroline Catmur

Ten years ago, Perspectives in Psychological Science published the Mirror Neuron Forum, in which authors debated the role of mirror neurons in action understanding, speech, imitation, and autism and asked whether mirror neurons are acquired through visual-motor learning. Subsequent research on these themes has made significant advances, which should encourage further, more systematic research. For action understanding, multivoxel pattern analysis, patient studies, and brain stimulation suggest that mirror-neuron brain areas contribute to low-level processing of observed actions (e.g., distinguishing types of grip) but not to high-level action interpretation (e.g., inferring actors’ intentions). In the area of speech perception, although it remains unclear whether mirror neurons play a specific, causal role in speech perception, there is compelling evidence for the involvement of the motor system in the discrimination of speech in perceptually noisy conditions. For imitation, there is strong evidence from patient, brain-stimulation, and brain-imaging studies that mirror-neuron brain areas play a causal role in copying of body movement topography. In the area of autism, studies using behavioral and neurological measures have tried and failed to find evidence supporting the “broken-mirror theory” of autism. Furthermore, research on the origin of mirror neurons has confirmed the importance of domain-general visual-motor associative learning rather than canalized visual-motor learning, or motor learning alone.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 2113-2113 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Borghi ◽  
F. Binkofski

The ability to understand intentions of actions performed by others is one of the prerequisites for social interaction. This ability has been attributed to our capacity to mentalize others’ behaviour, by simulating or predicting their mental states that would cause that behaviour and make it comprehensible. Brain imaging studies revealed the so called “mentalizng network” including the pSTS/TPJ, the temporal poles and the medial prefrontal cortex. This network gets constantly activated anytime we try to take the perspective of others or try to simulate their state of mind. On the other hand the discovery of mirror neurons has provided an additional explanation for understanding of the content of actions. The functional properties of these neurons point out that action understanding is primarily based on a mechanism that directly matches the sensory representation of perceived actions with one's own motor representation of the same actions. We provide evidence that both systems interact closely during the processing of intentionality of actions. Thus mentalizing is not the only form of intentional understanding and motor and intentional components of action are closely interwoven. Both systems play an important role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.


2021 ◽  
pp. 108001
Author(s):  
Vu Thi Hoa ◽  
Muneko Nishijo ◽  
Pham Ngoc Thao ◽  
Pham The Tai ◽  
Hoang Van Luong ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 2193-2202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Gangitano ◽  
Felix M. Mottaghy ◽  
Alvaro Pascual-Leone

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helene Haker ◽  
Wolfram Kawohl ◽  
Uwe Herwig ◽  
Wulf Rössler

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Kilner ◽  
Karl J. Friston

AbstractEver since their discovery, mirror neurons have generated much interest and debate. A commonly held view of mirror neuron function is that they transform “visual information into knowledge,” thus enabling action understanding and non-verbal social communication between con-specifics (Rizzolatti & Craighero 2004). This functionality is thought to be so important that it has been argued that mirror neurons must be a result of selective pressure.


2014 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. S255
Author(s):  
Hulegar A. Abhishekh ◽  
Urvaksh M. Mehta ◽  
Rakshathi Basavaraju ◽  
Jagadisha Thirthalli ◽  
Bangalore Gangadhar

2012 ◽  
Vol 508 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G. Enticott ◽  
Bronwyn A. Harrison ◽  
Sara L. Arnold ◽  
Kaitlyn Nibaldi ◽  
Rebecca A. Segrave ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document