Efficacy of Combination Docetaxel and Nintedanib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Thailand: A Multicenter Study

IntroductionThe mainstay systemic treatment for non-oncogenic addictive advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer is chemotherapy. Anti-angiogenic agents are additive compounds that enhance disease control and lead to improvement of overall survival benefit. Recently PD-(L)1 blockage, a checkpoint inhibitor, has been adopted as another line of treatment. A sequential strategy to enhance the efficacy of combination docetaxel and nintedanib after immunotherapy, correlated with genomic mutation, has been explored.MethodA retrospective cohort study of 56 patients from 8 centers in Thailand who received combination docetaxel and nintedanib via the Thai nintedanib Named Patient Use program was conducted. Demographic characteristics, treatment details, and treatment responses were retrieved from medical records.ResultsThe majority of patients were male (62.5%) with adenocarcinoma subtype (88%). Thirty-five percent had sensitizing EGFR mutation. Combination docetaxel and nintedanib was given as second to fourth line of treatment. Median PFS of docetaxel/nintedanib was 5.6 months [95% CI 4.8-6.9]. Median OS of the entire cohort was 22.5 months [95% CI 20.2-31.1]. Among them, only four patients received this combination after immunotherapy which limited the validity of efficacy analysis. Median PFS of those four patients was 7.9 months [range 5.2-9.1] which was slightly higher than the remaining cohort (median PFS 4.5 months, 95% CI: 4.0-6.0, p-value 0.09). Among the adenocarcinoma subtype, a relapse-time of platinum-doublet chemotherapy of more than 6 months was solely indicated as a benefit of combination docetaxel/nintedanib treatment compared to the relapse-time of platinum-doublet chemotherapy of less than 6 months by multivariate HR of PFS 0.32 [95% CI: 0.14-0.68, p-value 0.003].ConclusionCombination docetaxel and nintedanib provided more benefit in relapse-time of platinum-doublet chemotherapy of more than 6 months in advanced stage adenocarcinoma lung cancer. Neither EGFR nor ALK alteration influenced the outcome of treatment.

Download Full-text

Association of STK11/LKB1 genomic alterations with lack of benefit from the addition of pembrolizumab to platinum doublet chemotherapy in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.102 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 102-102 ◽

Cited By ~ 32

Author(s):

Ferdinandos Skoulidis ◽

Kathryn Cecilia Arbour ◽

Matthew David Hellmann ◽

Pradnya Dinkar Patil ◽

Melina Elpi Marmarelis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Small Cell ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Genomic Alterations ◽

The Impact ◽

Doublet Chemotherapy ◽

Platinum Doublet

102 Background: Addition of pembrolizumab (P) to platinum-doublet chemotherapy [carboplatin (or cisplatin) and pemetrexed (CP)] prolongs overall survival and is a standard of care (SOC) for the 1st line treatment of metastatic EGFR/ALK wild-type (wt) non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (mnsNSCLC). Despite widespread adoption of the CPP regimen, molecular determinants of clinical benefit from the addition of P to CP remain poorly defined. We previously identified genomic alterations in STK11/LKB1 as a major driver of primary resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in mnsNSCLC. Here, we examine the impact of STK11/LKB1 alterations on clinical outcomes with CPP chemo-immunotherapy. Methods: 497 pts with mnsNSCLC and tumor genomic profiling encompassing STK11/LKB1 from 17 academic institutions in the US and Europe were included in this study. Clinical outcomes were collected for two distinct patient cohorts: a) 377 pts treated with first-line CPP (or > 1st line following FDA-approved TKIs) that were alive for 14 days thereafter and b) 120 STK11/LKB1-mt pts that received CP prior to regulatory approval of CPP. Results: Among 377 CPP-treated pts, STK11/LKB1 genomic alterations (N = 102) were associated with significantly shorter PFS (mPFS 4.8m vs 7.2m, HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.0; P = 0.0063) and shorter OS (mOS 10.6m vs 16.7m, HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.27; P = 0.0083) compared with STK11/LKB1-wt tumors (N = 275). ORR also differed significantly between the two groups (32.6% vs 44.7%, P = 0.049). Similar results were obtained when limiting the analysis to EGFR and ALK-wt tumors (N = 333). Importantly, in pts with STK11/LKB1-mt mnsNSCLC, addition of pembrolizumab to CP did not improve PFS (mPFS 4.8m vs 4.3m, HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.54, P = 0.75) or OS (mOS 10.6m vs 10.3m, HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.49, P = 0.79) compared to CP alone. Conclusions: In mnsNSCLC, STK11/LKB1 alterations define a subgroup of pts with inferior clinical outcomes with CPP and lack of benefit from the addition of pembrolizumab to CP chemotherapy. Novel therapeutic strategies are required to establish effective antitumor immunity in STK11/LKB1-mutant NSCLC.

Download Full-text