scholarly journals The Role of Alpha-Band Brain Oscillations as a Sensory Suppression Mechanism during Selective Attention

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Foxe ◽  
Adam C. Snyder
2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian H. Gotlib ◽  
Dana Neubauer Yue ◽  
Jutta Joormann
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 32-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sawa Senzaki ◽  
Sandra A. Wiebe ◽  
Takahiko Masuda ◽  
Yuki Shimizu

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Ghiani ◽  
Marcello Maniglia ◽  
Luca Battaglini ◽  
David Melcher ◽  
Luca Ronconi

Neurophysiological studies in humans employing magneto- (MEG) and electro- (EEG) encephalography increasingly suggest that oscillatory rhythmic activity of the brain may be a core mechanism for binding sensory information across space, time, and object features to generate a unified perceptual representation. To distinguish whether oscillatory activity is causally related to binding processes or whether, on the contrary, it is a mere epiphenomenon, one possibility is to employ neuromodulatory techniques such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). tACS has seen a rising interest due to its ability to modulate brain oscillations in a frequency-dependent manner. In the present review, we critically summarize current tACS evidence for a causal role of oscillatory activity in spatial, temporal, and feature binding in the context of visual perception. For temporal binding, the emerging picture supports a causal link with the power and the frequency of occipital alpha rhythms (8–12 Hz); however, there is no consistent evidence on the causal role of the phase of occipital tACS. For feature binding, the only study available showed a modulation by occipital alpha tACS. The majority of studies that successfully modulated oscillatory activity and behavioral performance in spatial binding targeted parietal areas, with the main rhythms causally linked being the theta (~7 Hz) and beta (~18 Hz) frequency bands. On the other hand, spatio-temporal binding has been directly modulated by parieto-occipital gamma (~40–60 Hz) and alpha (10 Hz) tACS, suggesting a potential role of cross-frequency coupling when binding across space and time. Nonetheless, negative or partial results have also been observed, suggesting methodological limitations that should be addressed in future research. Overall, the emerging picture seems to support a causal role of brain oscillations in binding processes and, consequently, a certain degree of plasticity for shaping binding mechanisms in visual perception, which, if proved to have long lasting effects, can find applications in different clinical populations.


Pain ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (10) ◽  
pp. 1979-1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tine Vervoort ◽  
Zina Trost ◽  
Dimitri M.L. Van Ryckeghem

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1880-1891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina M. Rischer ◽  
Ana M. González‐Roldán ◽  
Pedro Montoya ◽  
Sandra Gigl ◽  
Fernand Anton ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. e12381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Hillairet de Boisferon ◽  
Amy H. Tift ◽  
Nicholas J. Minar ◽  
David J. Lewkowicz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document