scholarly journals Risk of Bleeding Associated With Antidepressants: Impact of Causality Assessment and Competition Bias on Signal Detection

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Zeiss ◽  
Bernhard J. Connemann ◽  
Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona ◽  
Maximilian Gahr

Introduction: Until now, methods of pharmacovigilance as disproportionality analysis were not capable of proving the otherwise well-established increased bleeding risk related to antidepressants (ADs). As bleeding events with ADs often occur in combination with antithrombotics, they might not be considered causative of, but merely “linked” with, the bleeding event. Therefore, we hypothesized that the causality assessment of bleeding events in association with ADs and the competitive impact of antithrombotics are factors contributing to the non-findings of previous pharmacovigilance studies.Methods: We performed a case/non-case study based on data from VigiBaseTM and calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs) for 25 ADs. We used individual case safety reports (ICSRs) that were differently categorized in the database regarding their type of association between drug and event. Furthermore, we investigated the competitive impact of antithrombotics by comparing RORs with and without ICSRs related to antithrombotics.Results: Analysis of ICSRs that were categorized as causally associated resulted in the detection of only two signals (citalopram and escitalopram; upper gastrointestinal bleeding). Analysis of ICSRs irrespective of the type of association resulted in the detection of signals in 8 out of 25 ADs (regarding bleeding, in general, gastrointestinal bleeding and upper gastrointestinal bleeding). Consideration of ICSRs associated with antithrombotics as competitive substances did not have a major impact on signal detection in our analysis.Conclusion: Categorization of the type of association between drug and event affects the results of quantitative signal detection. Causality assessment seems to play a major role in signal detection, probably particularly concerning rare, unknown, or clinically insignificant adverse drug reactions. ADs appear to significantly increase the bleeding risk, even independent of antithrombotic comedication.

Author(s):  
C. H. Morales Uribe ◽  
S. Sierra Sierra ◽  
A. M. Hernández Hernández ◽  
A. F. Arango Durango ◽  
G. A. Lopez

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Hakan Kocoglu ◽  
Basak Oguz ◽  
Hakan Dogan ◽  
Yildiz Okuturlar ◽  
Mehmet Hursitoglu ◽  
...  

Purpose. NSAIDs and ASA may cause upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) both in adults and in elderly. There is no study that compares this increased bleeding risk between adult and elderly subjects.Methods. A total of 524 patients with UGIB were included in this study. The data of patients were, respectively, analyzed.Results. NSAIDs and ASA-associated UGIB rates were similar between <65 years (345 patients) (group 1) and ≥65 years (179 patients) (group 2) (28.4% versus 23.5%,p=0.225and 13% versus 19%,p=0.071, resp.). Warfarin-associated UGIB was found significantly higher in group 2 than group 1. Elderly patients with NSAID-associated UGIB had significantly higher length of stay (LoS) and CoH than adult patients with NSAID-associated UGIB (p=0.002and 0.001, resp.). Elderly patients with ASA-associated UGIB had significantly higher CoH than adult patients with NSAID-associated UGIB.Conclusions. Using NSAIDs without gastroprotective drugs or using ASA with gastroprotective drugs in elderly patients is as safe as in adult patients. Not only should adding gastroprotective drugs to ASA or NSAID be based on their risk of UGIB, but the cost of hospitalization of ASA or NSAID-associated UGIB should be considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document