scholarly journals Development of a Radiomic-Based Model Predicting Lymph Node Involvement in Prostate Cancer Patients

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (22) ◽  
pp. 5672
Author(s):  
Vincent Bourbonne ◽  
Vincent Jaouen ◽  
Truong An Nguyen ◽  
Valentin Tissot ◽  
Laurent Doucet ◽  
...  

Significant advances in lymph node involvement (LNI) risk modeling in prostate cancer (PCa) have been achieved with the addition of visual interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, but it is likely that quantitative analysis could further improve prediction models. In this study, we aimed to develop and internally validate a novel LNI risk prediction model based on radiomic features extracted from preoperative multimodal MRI. All patients who underwent a preoperative MRI and radical prostatectomy with extensive lymph node dissection were retrospectively included in a single institution. Patients were randomly divided into the training (60%) and testing (40%) sets. Radiomic features were extracted from the index tumor volumes, delineated on the apparent diffusion coefficient corrected map and the T2 sequences. A ComBat harmonization method was applied to account for inter-site heterogeneity. A prediction model was trained using a neural network approach (Multilayer Perceptron Network, SPSS v24.0©) combining clinical, radiomic and all features. It was then evaluated on the testing set and compared to the current available models using the Receiver Operative Characteristics and the C-Index. Two hundred and eighty patients were included, with a median age of 65.2 y (45.3–79.6), a mean PSA level of 9.5 ng/mL (1.04–63.0) and 79.6% of ISUP ≥ 2 tumors. LNI occurred in 51 patients (18.2%), with a median number of extracted nodes of 15 (10–19). In the testing set, with their respective cutoffs applied, the Partin, Roach, Yale, MSKCC, Briganti 2012 and 2017 models resulted in a C-Index of 0.71, 0.66, 0.55, 0.67, 0.65 and 0.73, respectively, while our proposed combined model resulted in a C-Index of 0.89 in the testing set. Radiomic features extracted from the preoperative MRI scans and combined with clinical features through a neural network seem to provide added predictive performance compared to state of the art models regarding LNI risk prediction in PCa.

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 129-135
Author(s):  
Julian Chavarriaga ◽  
Catalina Barco-Castillo ◽  
Jessica Santander ◽  
Laura Zuluaga ◽  
Camilo Medina ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Prediction of lymph node involvement (LNI) is of paramount importance for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). Multiple statistical models predicting LNI have been developed to support clinical decision-making regarding the need of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Our aim is to evaluate the prediction ability of the best-performing prediction tools for LNI in PCa in a Latin-American population. Methods Clinicopathological data of 830 patients with PCa who underwent RP and ePLND between 2007 and 2018 was obtained. Only data from patients who had ≥ 10 lymph nodes (LNs) harvested were included (n = 576 patients). Four prediction models were validated using this cohort: The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) web calculator, Briganti v.2017, Yale formula and Partin tables v.2016. The performance of the prediction tools was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Results The median age was 61 years old (interquartile range [IQR] 56–66), the median Prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 6,81 ng/mL (IQR 4,8–10,1) and the median of LNs harvested was 17 (IQR 13–23), and LNI was identified in 53 patients (9.3%). Predictions from the 2017 Briganti nomogram AUC (0.85) and the Yale formula AUC (0.85) were the most accurate; MSKCC and 2016 Partin tables AUC were both 0,84. Conclusion There was no significant difference in the performance of the four validated prediction tools in a Latin-American population compared with the European or North American patients in whom these tools have been validated. Among the 4 models, the Briganti v.2017 and Yale formula yielded the best results, but the AUC overlapped with the other validated models.


2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 906-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia Rahman ◽  
Harry Cosmatos ◽  
Giatri Dave ◽  
Stephen Williams ◽  
Michael Tome

2013 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. S179
Author(s):  
S. Isebaert ◽  
E. Lerut ◽  
L. Van den Bergh ◽  
S. Joniau ◽  
R. Oyen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 896-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Van den Bergh ◽  
Steven Joniau ◽  
Karin Haustermans ◽  
Christophe M. Deroose ◽  
Sofie Isebaert ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document