scholarly journals Statement of Peer Review

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Paolo Bison ◽  
Gianluca Cadelano ◽  
Giovanni Ferrarini ◽  
Davide Moroni
Keyword(s):  
Conference Proceedings ◽  
Peer Review

In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to a peer review administered by the volume editors [...]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

2021 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Conference Proceedings ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) All submitted papers will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers, who are encouraged to give constructive comments and suggestions to the authors. The review is single-blind – the author doesn’t know the names of the reviewers assigned to the review of the paper. The authors of submitted papers will receive the review comments and recommendations and will have a possibility to amend their papers based on the review comments and suggestions and upload the revised versions. If both reviewers indicate that the paper can’t be published then it will not be accepted for publication, however, the talk might be delivered at the Conference if the reviewers specify that in the review. The publication of the papers in the Conference Proceedings is possible only in case the talk is presented at the Conference. • Conference submission management system: - Self-made submission management system • Number of submissions received: Number of full papers submitted for publication in IOP Conference Proceedings - 232 • Number of submissions sent for review: 232 • Number of submissions accepted: 172 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 74.13% • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.9 • Total number of reviewers involved: 48 • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Anastasia Kaptsova Affiliation:ITMO University, Russia Email :[email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2065 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Conference Proceedings ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Related Field ◽  
Peer Reviews ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Easychair Submission System • Number of submissions received: 38 • Number of submissions sent for review: 38 • Number of submissions accepted: 23 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 57% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 17 • Any additional info on review process: All received submissions were subjected to double-blind peer reviews, who are expert or have been experiencing in the related field for years. The accepted papers must be revised according to the referees’ comments and suggestions, before inclusion in the conference proceedings. Manuscripts submitted should be original & unpublished and written in accordance with the standard IOP paper template. • Contact person for queries: Ms. Ariel Xie ([email protected])

Newfound Press: The digital imprint of the University of Tennessee Libraries

First Monday ◽  
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda L. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Conference Proceedings ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Research Library ◽  
Open Access Publishing ◽  
University Of Tennessee ◽  
Digital Multimedia ◽  
Scholarly Publications ◽  
The University

The University of Tennessee Libraries launched its digital imprint, Newfound Press, in 2005 to develop a framework for making peer reviewed scholarly and specialized works available worldwide. Building on local digitization investments, Newfound Press has published two monographs, hosts a born–digital journal, and is experimenting with publishing conference proceedings as digital multimedia. Through Newfound Press, the University of Tennessee is promoting open access publishing while resolving issues such as finding sustainable funding, creating a process for peer review “on the fly,” and establishing credibility as a viable scholarly publications venue. If every research library were to provide similar services, access to scholarship could become more transparent than ever before.

scholarly journals Statement of Peer Review

Proceedings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Elena Savoia ◽  
Alberto Montrond ◽  
Anna Ekström
Keyword(s):  
Conference Proceedings ◽  
Peer Review

In submitting conference proceedings to Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. [...]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2128 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Conference Proceedings ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Related Field ◽  
Peer Reviews ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Single Blind

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) • Conference submission management system: EasyChair • Number of submissions received: 70 • Number of submissions sent for review: 64 (due to high plagiarism) • Number of submissions accepted:48 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 68.5% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved:147 • Any additional info on review process: All received submissions were subjected to double-blind peer reviews, who are expert or have been experiencing in the related field for years. The accepted papers must be revised according to the referees’ comments and suggestions, before inclusion in the conference proceedings. Manuscripts submitted should be original & unpublished and written in accordance with the standard IOP paper template. • Contact person for queries: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2127 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Conference Proceedings ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Program Committee ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Conference Theme ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of 2127 have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: Self-developed web system for submission and review of articles • Number of submissions received: 118 • Number of submissions sent for review: 79 • Number of submissions accepted: 75 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 64 • Average number of reviews per paper: 1-2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 12 • Any additional info on review process: Acceptance of articles for publication in the conference proceedings took place in two stages. At the first stage, the submitting author registered the article with annotation and information about other authors. The organizing and program committee reviewed the registered articles by their annotations for compliance with the conference theme, the presence of scientific novelty, and relevance. After a successful check, the authors of the claimed article were sent information to access the author’s section. In it, the authors at the second stage had to upload the article and accompanying documents prepared according to the JPCS template. Each article was reviewed by one of the editors for design. Parallel to this, articles were sent to reviewers for evaluation (submissions sent for review). The marks were given according to the following criteria: scientific relevance, scientific novelty, the possibility of putting research into practice, the fundamentality of research, and the language level. In addition to the marks, each reviewer had to give his opinion on the possibility of publishing an article in the conference proceedings. After the article was accepted, the editors made edits to fully match the article to the JPCS template. The camera-ready version was sent to the authors in the form of a pdf file to make possible changes. • Contact person for queries: OMFI-2021 Scientific Secretary: Ph.D., Associate Professor Poroykov A.Yu., [email protected]

scholarly journals Statement of Peer Review

Proceedings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Ekin Akkol ◽  
Ali Mert Erdoğan ◽  
Serhat Peker ◽  
Onur Dogan
Keyword(s):  
Conference Proceedings ◽  
Peer Review

In submitting conference proceedings to Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedingscertify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjectedto peer review, administered by the volume editors. [...]

Peer review of a dental curriculum: how one school did it

1976 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 761-762
Author(s):  
PK Morse ◽  
TR Dirksen
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Dental Curriculum
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document