scholarly journals EGb 761® Does Not Affect Blood Coagulation and Bleeding Time in Patients with Probable Alzheimer’s Dementia—Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1678
Author(s):  
Charlotte Kloft ◽  
Robert Hoerr

Following reports of bleeding upon Ginkgo intake, we assessed whether Ginkgo extract EGb 761® affects coagulation or platelet function or increases the risk of bleeding. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio and bleeding time were measured in patients with Alzheimer’s dementia at baseline, weeks 6 and 26. A total of 513 patients were randomized to 120 mg (n = 169) or 240 mg EGb 761® (n = 170) or placebo (n = 174). No relevant changes were found for coagulation parameters and bleeding time. Numbers of bleeding-related adverse events were similar in all groups. Concomitant intake of acetylsalicylic acid was documented for 68 patients in the placebo group and 105 in the EGb 761® groups. Within these groups, the means at baseline and week 26 differed by less than 1 unit for prothrombin time and bleeding time and less than 0.1 unit for international normalized ratio. Data on warfarin treatment in nine patients each taking placebo or EGb 761® did not indicate enhancement of warfarin effects by EGb 761®. No evidence was found that EGb 761® affects hemostasis or increases the bleeding risk. No pharmacodynamic interactions with warfarin or acetylsalicylic acid were found.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. e35185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Fox ◽  
Monica Crugel ◽  
Ian Maidment ◽  
Bjorn Henrik Auestad ◽  
Simon Coulton ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 638-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Rai ◽  
G. Wright ◽  
L. Scott ◽  
B. Beston ◽  
J. Rest ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. S73-S73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Vellas ◽  
Sandrine Andrieu ◽  
Pierre-Jean Ousset ◽  
Mehemed Ouzid ◽  
Hélène Mathiex-Fortunet ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (S1) ◽  
pp. 72-72
Author(s):  
Carol Sheei-Meei Wang ◽  
Kuo-Sheng Cheng ◽  
Chia-Hung Tang ◽  
Nien-Tsen Hou ◽  
Pei-Fang Chien ◽  
...  

Introduction:Identifying effective treatments is a critical issue for Alzheimer’s dementia (AD). The pathological amyloid deposits of AD result in disruption of the balance between long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) of neuronal cells and synaptic plasticity. Brain stimulation in dementia research, especially with relatively safe tDCS, has been taken seriously recently. In theory, tDCS affects long-term synaptic plasticity through LTP and LTD, thereby improving cognitive ability. Recently, an increasing number of studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of tDCS in AD and concluded a positive therapeutic effect. Currently, there are no studies of tDCS for AD in Taiwan. In this study, we investigate the effects of tDCS in AD.Method:Using a double-blind, randomized and sham- controlled trial design, Sixteen AD aged 55-90 years (8 active, mean age 73.88 and 8 sham, mean age 74.75) were included in the study. AD diagnostics is according to DSM-5 criteria. The CDR ratings of AD participants ranged from 0.5 to 2. All subjects completed ten consecutive daily sessions in which they received either an active or a sham tDCS over the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (anodal) and a cathodal electrode on the right supraorbital area. In each session, we applied a current intensity of 2 mA and an electrode size of 35 cm2 for 30 min in the active group. All subjects received a series of neuropsychological tests, which included CDR, MMSE, CASI and WCST, before and after these treatment sessions on the first day and 4 weeks later. Chi- square test, Wilcoxon signed ranks test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to assess the differences in participant demographic characteristics and to compare the differences among groups.Results:The active group showed significant improvement in total correct item, Conceptual level Responses (reflecting insight into the correct sorting principles), Categories Completed (reflecting overall success), and Trials to complete first categories (reflecting initial conceptual ability) of WCST 4 weeks later after the final stimulation. There were no statistically significant differences between before and after the 10-session course for the sham group.Conclusion:tDCS stimulation improves cognitive operation and Conceptual Ability of AD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document