scholarly journals Ejaculations and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: An Impossible Compromise? A Comprehensive Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 5788
Author(s):  
Nicolas Couteau ◽  
Igor Duquesne ◽  
Panthier Frédéric ◽  
Nicolas Thiounn ◽  
Marc-Olivier Timsit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Initial Evaluation ◽  
Laser Source ◽  
Reductase Inhibitors ◽  
Urinary Tract Symptoms ◽  
Simple Prostatectomy ◽  
Endoscopic Enucleation

Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is commonly responsible for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men aged 50 or over. Sexual dysfunctions, such as ejaculatory disorders (EjD), go along with LUTS but are frequently overlooked in the initial evaluation. This review aimed to detail BPH-related EjD, as well as their modifications by medical, surgical, and interventional treatments. Methods: We conducted a narrative review looking for publications between 1990 and 2020, regarding physiopathology, epidemiology, evaluation, and therapeutic management (medical, surgical, and interventional) of BPH-related EjD. Results: Sixty-five articles were included in our final analysis. Forty-six percent of men presenting with LUTS reported EjD. If the prevalence increases with age and LUTS severity, the functional impairment is not correlated with age. Several self-questionnaires evaluated the sexual function, but only four approaches are specific to EjD. Medical therapies were exposed to anejaculation, rather than retrograde ejaculation (RE) (4–30% (alpha-blockers), 4–18% (5-alpha-reductase inhibitors)). Regarding surgical therapies, trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and incision of the prostate (TUIP) are associated with 50–70% and 21–35% of RE. The RE rate is important after open simple prostatectomy but can be reduced with robotic approaches and urethral sparing techniques (19%). Anatomic endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) with or without a laser source is associated with an 11–36% RE rate, according to supramontanal preservation. Recent surgical techniques (Rezum©, Aquablation©, or Urolift©) were developed to preserve antegrade ejaculation with promising short-term results. Regardless of the surgical approach, anatomic studies suggest that the preservation of peri-montanal tissue (7.5 mm laterally; 10 mm proximally) is primordial to avoid post-operative RE. Finally, prostate artery embolization (PAE) limits the RE rate but exposes it to a 12 months 10% re-intervention rate. Conclusion: EjD concerns almost half of the patients presenting BPH-related LUTS. Initial evaluation of EjD impairment is primordial before medical or surgical therapy. Peri-montanal tissue preservation represents a key point for antegrade ejaculation preservation, regardless of the surgical option.

scholarly journals Sexual Dysfunctions Related to Drugs Used in the Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Narrative Review on α-Blockers and 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors

Uro ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 82-98
Author(s):  
Antonio La Torre ◽  
Caterina Palleria ◽  
Irene Tamanini ◽  
Andrea Scardigli ◽  
Tommaso Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Sexual Dysfunction ◽  
Lower Urinary Tract ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Sexual Dysfunctions ◽  
Reductase Inhibitors ◽  
Urinary Tract Symptoms ◽  
5 Alpha Reductase Inhibitors ◽  
Lower Urinary

This is a critical review of the current literature data about sexual dysfunction as a potential side effect related to drugs commonly used for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. In this narrative review, we analyzed data from the literature related to the development of sexual dysfunctions during the treatment of BPH or LUTS. Both α-blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) can induce erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory disorders and a reduction in sexual desire. The sexual side effect profile of these drugs is different. Among the α-blockers, silodosin appears to have the highest incidence of ejaculatory disorders. Persistent sexual side effects after the discontinuation of finasteride have been recently reported; however, further studies are needed to clarify the true incidence and the significance of this finding. However, most of the published studies are affected by a weak methodology and other important limitations, with only a few RCTs available. Therefore, it is desirable that future studies will include validated tools to assess and diagnose the sexual dysfunction induced by these medications, especially for ejaculation and sexual desire disorders.

Is Early Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Treatment Worthwhile?

2017 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Presicce ◽  
Cosimo De Nunzio ◽  
Andrea Tubaro
Keyword(s):  
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Treatment Result ◽  
Urinary Tract Symptoms ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Risk Of Disease

Background The medical armamentaria for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have been extensively implemented over the past decade. Nevertheless, the timeliest moment for a possible treatment has not been fully established. Evidence Acquisition A systematic literature search in January 1996 until June 2016 was performed to answer the following question: in men with LUTS due to BPH, does early treatment result in better outcome? An ad hoc Population/patient Intervention/indicator Comparator/control Outcome (PICO) was developed. The Medline, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched. Each article title and abstract were reviewed for relevance and appropriateness with regard to the topic of this review. Evidence Synthesis Overtime, the introduction of novel medications and the implementation of surgical techniques have significantly improved the treatment outcomes and markedly reduced the rate of BPH surgery. Early treatments in patients at risk of disease progression may result in better clinical outcomes than a delayed approach. However, the evidence to support early intervention remains weak and criteria to identify the patient phenotype that could best benefit from immediate treatment remain ill-defined. On the contrary, the patients who ultimately undergo surgery following prolonged pharmacological treatment present with larger prostates, older age and comorbidities. At the same time, the technological progress has partly compensated this critical scenario, and commonly, a nonpejorative trend has been recorded in perioperative complications. Conclusions The ideal moment to begin a treatment in LUTS/BPH patients is still uncertain, and surprisingly, rare good quality studies are available on this topic.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Simple Prostatectomy and Endoscopic Enucleation of Prostate for Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinze Li ◽  
Dehong Cao ◽  
Chunyang Meng ◽  
Zhongyou Xia ◽  
Lei Peng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Maximum Flow ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Simple Prostatectomy ◽  
Comprehensive Search ◽  
Endoscopic Enucleation

Background: Minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (MISP) and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) are the two most commonly used methods for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but it remains unclear which of the two is superior. This study aims to perform a pooled analysis to compare efficacy and safety profiles between MISP and EEP.Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify eligible studies comparing MISP with EEP. Parameters including efficacy and safety outcomes were compared using Stata 14.0 version.Results: Eight comparative trials with 1,504 patients were included. Compared to MISP, EEP demonstrated shorter operative time (mean difference [MD] 46.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.92 to 72.82, p = 0.0006), lesser hemoglobin decrease (standardized MD [SMD] 0.59, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.95, p = 0.001), lower catheterization time (SMD 4.13, 95% CI 2.16 to 6.10, p < 0.001), and shorter length of stay (SMD 2.38, 95% CI 1.40 to 3.36, p < 0.001). However, overall complications and blood transfusions did not differ between the two groups. Moreover, EEP had better postvoid residual volume (PVR) at 6-month (MD 14.39, 95% CI 11.06 to 17.72, p < 0.001) and comparable 3- and 6-month International Prostate Symptom Score, 3- and 6-month maximum flow rate, 3-month PVR, and 3-month quality of life compared with MISP.Conclusion: Both MISP and EEP are effective and safe surgical procedures for the treatment of large BPH. EEP appears to have a superior perioperative profile compared to MISP. This should be interpreted with caution due to the significant heterogeneity between studies. Hence, treatment selection should be based on the surgeon's experience and availability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document