scholarly journals Laparoscopic versus Open Transverse-Incision Approach for Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Claudio F. Feo ◽  
Panagiotis Paliogiannis ◽  
Alessandro Fancellu ◽  
Angelo Zinellu ◽  
Giorgio C. Ginesu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Right Hemicolectomy ◽  
Transverse Incision ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Right Colon Cancer

Background and Objectives: There is general agreement on the benefits of laparoscopy for treatment of rectal and left colon cancers, whereas findings regarding the comparison of laparoscopic and open right colonic resections are discordant. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the outcomes and advantages of laparoscopic versus transverse-incision open surgery for management of right colon cancer. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Comparative studies evaluating the results of laparoscopic and transverse-incision open right hemicolectomies were analyzed. The measured outcomes were mean operative time, time to feeding, duration of hospital stay, and number of lymph nodes harvested. Results: A total of 5 studies including 318 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis revealed no differences in time to resume oral feeding, hospital stay, and number of lymph nodes harvested in between groups, but mean length of surgery was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group. Conclusion: These data confirm that the preferred approach to right hemicolectomy is yet unclear. Laparoscopy has a longer operative time than transverse-incision open surgery, and no significant short-term benefits were observed for the studied parameters. Well-designed randomized control trials (RCTs) might help to identify the differences between these two techniques for the surgical treatment of right colon cancer.

Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for obstructing right colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. 387-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Cirocchi ◽  
F. Cesare Campanile ◽  
S. Di Saverio ◽  
G. Popivanov ◽  
L. Carlini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Open Colectomy ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Right Colon Cancer

Laparoscopic Versus Open Complete Mesocolon Excision in Right Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 3179-3190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Ali Chaouch ◽  
Mohamed Wejih Dougaz ◽  
Ibtissem Bouasker ◽  
Hichem Jerraya ◽  
Wafa Ghariani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Right Colon Cancer

scholarly journals Systematic review of comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Liu ◽  
Wei-hong Yang ◽  
Zhou-guang Jiao ◽  
Ji-fu Zhang ◽  
Rui Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Right Hemicolectomy ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Right Colon Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy ◽  
Operation Duration ◽  
The Right

Abstract Background Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (SILS) has long used in surgery for a long time. However, there is barely a systemic review related to the comparison between the SILS and the conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (CLS) for the right colon cancer in the long term follow-up. Herein, we used the most recent articles to compare these two techniques by meta-analysis. Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Wanfang databases to compare SILS with CLS for right colon cancer up to May 2019. The operative, postoperative, pathological and mid-term follow-up outcomes of nine studies were extracted and compared. Results A total of 1356 patients participated in 9 studies, while 653 patients were assigned to the SILS group and 703 patients were assigned to the CLS group. The patients’ baselines in the SILS group were consistent with those in the CLS group. Compared to the CLS group, the SILS group had a shorter operation duration (SMD − 23.49, 95%CI − 36.71 to − 10.27, P < 0.001, chi-square = 24.11), shorter hospital stay (SMD − 0.76, 95% `CI − 1.07 to − 0.45, P < 0.001, chi-square = 9.85), less blood loss (SMD − 8.46, 95% CI − 14.59 to − 2.34; P < 0.05; chi-square = 2.26), smaller incision length (SMD − 1.60, 95% CI − 2.66 to − 0.55, P < 0.001; chi-square = 280.44), more lymph node harvested (SMD − 0.98, 95% CI − 1.79 to − 0.16, P < 0.05; chi-square = 4.61), and a longer proximal surgical edge (SMD − 0.51, 95% CI − 0.93 to − 0.09, P < 0.05; chi-square = 2.42). No significant difference was found in other indexes. After we removed a single large study, we performed another meta-analysis again. The operation duration in the SILS group was still better than that in the CLS group. Conclusion SILS could be a faster and more reliable approach than CLS for the right colon cancer and could accelerate patient recovery, especially for patients with a low BMI.

scholarly journals Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision with Central Vascular Ligation for Right Colon Cancer: Surgical Technique and Short-term Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 674-683
Author(s):  
C. Ramachandra ◽  
Pavan Sugoor ◽  
Uday Karjol ◽  
Ravi Arjunan ◽  
Syed Altaf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Complete Mesocolic Excision ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Central Vascular Ligation ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Right Colon Cancer ◽  
Vascular Ligation ◽  
Mesocolic Excision

Abstract Background Minimally invasive colorectal surgery has demonstrated to have the same oncological results as open surgery, with better clinical outcomes. Robotic assistance is an evolution of minimally invasive technique. Purpose The study aims to present technical details and short-term oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) for right colon cancer. Methodology Fifty-two consecutive patients affected by right colon cancer were operated between May 2016 and February 2020 with da Vinci Xi platform. Data regarding surgical and short-term oncological outcomes were systematically collected in a colorectal specific database for statistical analysis. Results Thirty-seven (71.15%) and 15 (28.85%) patients underwent right and extended right hemicoletomy with an extracorporeal anastomosis. Median age was 55 years. Mean operative time was 182 ± 36 min. Mean blood loss was 110 ± 90 ml. Conversion rate was 3.84% (two cases). 78.84% (41 cases) were pT3 and mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 28 ± 4. 1/52 (1.92%) had a documented anastomotic leak requiring exploratory laparotomy and diversion proximal ileostomy. Surgery-related grade IIIa–IIIb Calvien Dindo morbidity were noted in 9.61% and 1.92%, respectively. Conclusion Robotic assistance allows performance of oncological adequate dissection of the right colon with radical lymphadenectomy as in open surgery, confirming the safety and oncological adequacy of this technique, with acceptable results and short-term outcomes.

scholarly journals Inguinal abscess as presentation of a right colon cancer. A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aníbal Armando Medina Velasco ◽  
Ignacio Gemio del Rey ◽  
Roberto de la Plaza Llamas ◽  
Vladimir Arteaga Peralta ◽  
José Manuel Ramia
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Right Colon Cancer

scholarly journals En bloc pancreaticoduodenectomy and right hemicolectomy to treat locally advanced right colon cancer: report of three cases

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Renato Pais Costa ◽  
Sergio Henrique Couto Horta ◽  
Alexandre Cruz Henriques ◽  
Jaques Waisberg ◽  
Manlio Basílio Speranzini
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Multivisceral Resection ◽  
Right Hemicolectomy ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Proximal Duodenum ◽  
Right Colon Cancer

ABSTRACT Although colorectal tumors are fairly common surgical conditions, 5 to 12% of these tumors are locally advanced (T4 tumors) upon diagnosis. In this particular situation, the efficacy of en bloc multivisceral resection has been proven. When right-colon cancer invades the proximal duodenum or even the pancreatic head, a challenging dilemma arises due to complexity of the curative surgical procedure. Therefore, en bloc pancreaticoduodenectomy with right hemicolectomy should be performed to obtain free margins. The present study reports three cases of locally advanced right-colon cancer invading the proximal duodenum. All of these cases underwent successful en bloc pancreaticoduodenectomy plus right hemicolectomy, with no death occurrence. Long-term survival was observed in two cases (30 and 50 months). In the third case, the patient did not present any recurrence twelve months after surgical treatment. Multivisceral resection with en bloc pancreaticoduodenectomy should be considered for patients who present acceptable risk for major surgery and no distant dissemination. This approach seems justified since the length of postoperative survival is longer in radically ressected groups (R0) than in palliativelly resected groups (R1-2).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document