scholarly journals Inguinal abscess as presentation of a right colon cancer. A systematic review

Author(s):  
Aníbal Armando Medina Velasco ◽  
Ignacio Gemio del Rey ◽  
Roberto de la Plaza Llamas ◽  
Vladimir Arteaga Peralta ◽  
José Manuel Ramia
Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Claudio F. Feo ◽  
Panagiotis Paliogiannis ◽  
Alessandro Fancellu ◽  
Angelo Zinellu ◽  
Giorgio C. Ginesu ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: There is general agreement on the benefits of laparoscopy for treatment of rectal and left colon cancers, whereas findings regarding the comparison of laparoscopic and open right colonic resections are discordant. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the outcomes and advantages of laparoscopic versus transverse-incision open surgery for management of right colon cancer. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Comparative studies evaluating the results of laparoscopic and transverse-incision open right hemicolectomies were analyzed. The measured outcomes were mean operative time, time to feeding, duration of hospital stay, and number of lymph nodes harvested. Results: A total of 5 studies including 318 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis revealed no differences in time to resume oral feeding, hospital stay, and number of lymph nodes harvested in between groups, but mean length of surgery was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group. Conclusion: These data confirm that the preferred approach to right hemicolectomy is yet unclear. Laparoscopy has a longer operative time than transverse-incision open surgery, and no significant short-term benefits were observed for the studied parameters. Well-designed randomized control trials (RCTs) might help to identify the differences between these two techniques for the surgical treatment of right colon cancer.


2017 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. 387-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Cirocchi ◽  
F. Cesare Campanile ◽  
S. Di Saverio ◽  
G. Popivanov ◽  
L. Carlini ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 3179-3190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Ali Chaouch ◽  
Mohamed Wejih Dougaz ◽  
Ibtissem Bouasker ◽  
Hichem Jerraya ◽  
Wafa Ghariani ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 42-42
Author(s):  
Rossella Reddavid ◽  
Giulia Osella ◽  
Francesco Evola ◽  
Lucia Puca ◽  
Letizia Spidalieri ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Shiraishi ◽  
Tetsuro Tominaga ◽  
Takashi Nonaka ◽  
Kiyoaki Hamada ◽  
Masato Araki ◽  
...  

AbstractSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has the potential to improve perioperative outcomes, including less postoperative pain, shorter operation time, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. However, SILS is technically difficult and needs a longer learning curve. Between April 2016 and September 2019, a total of 198 patients with clinical stage I/II right colon cancer underwent curative resection. In the case of the SILS approach, an organ retractor was usually used to overcome SILS-specific restrictions. The patients were divided into two groups by surgical approach: the SILS with organ retractor group (SILS-O, n = 33) and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (LAC, n = 165). Clinical T status was significantly higher in the LAC group (p = 0.016). Operation time was shorter and blood loss was lower in the SILS-O group compared to the LAC group (117 vs. 197 min, p = 0.027; 10 vs. 25 mL, p = 0.024, respectively). In the SILS-O group, surgical outcomes including operation time, blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and postoperative complications were not significantly different between those performed by experts and by non-experts. Longer operation time (p = 0.041) was significantly associated with complications on univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 2.514, 95%CI 1.047–6.035, p = 0.039). SILS-O was safe and feasible for right colon cancer. There is a potential to shorten the learning curve of SILS using an organ retractor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document