scholarly journals Evaluating Classifiers to Detect Arm Movement Intention from EEG Signals

Sensors ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 18172-18186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Planelles ◽  
Enrique Hortal ◽  
Álvaro Costa ◽  
Andrés Úbeda ◽  
Eduardo Iáez ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Gerardo Hernández ◽  
Luis G. Hernández ◽  
Erik Zamora ◽  
Humberto Sossa ◽  
Javier M. Antelis ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
S M Shafiul Hasan ◽  
Masudur Rahman Siddiquee ◽  
J. Sebastian Marquez ◽  
Ou Bai

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 2247-2253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalin Zhang ◽  
Lina Yao ◽  
Kaixuan Chen ◽  
Sen Wang ◽  
Pari Delir Haghighi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andres Ubeda ◽  
Enrique Hortal ◽  
Eduardo Ianez ◽  
Daniel Planelles ◽  
Jose M. Azorin

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 102137
Author(s):  
Achim Buerkle ◽  
William Eaton ◽  
Niels Lohse ◽  
Thomas Bamber ◽  
Pedro Ferreira

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest Nlandu Kamavuako ◽  
Mads Jochumsen ◽  
Imran Khan Niazi ◽  
Kim Dremstrup

Detection of movement intention from the movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) derived from the electroencephalogram (EEG) signals has shown to be important in combination with assistive devices for effective neurofeedback in rehabilitation. In this study, we compare time and frequency domain features to detect movement intention from EEG signals prior to movement execution. Data were recoded from 24 able-bodied subjects, 12 performing real movements, and 12 performing imaginary movements. Furthermore, six stroke patients with lower limb paresis were included. Temporal and spectral features were investigated in combination with linear discriminant analysis and compared with template matching. The results showed that spectral features were best suited for differentiating between movement intention and noise across different tasks. The ensemble average across tasks when using spectral features was (error = 3.4 ± 0.8%, sensitivity = 97.2 ± 0.9%, and specificity = 97 ± 1%) significantly better (P<0.01) than temporal features (error = 15 ± 1.4%, sensitivity: 85 ± 1.3%, and specificity: 84 ± 2%). The proposed approach also (error = 3.4 ± 0.8%) outperformed template matching (error = 26.9 ± 2.3%) significantly (P>0.001). Results imply that frequency information is important for detecting movement intention, which is promising for the application of this approach to provide patient-driven real-time neurofeedback.


Author(s):  
M. Gomez-Rodriguez ◽  
M. Grosse-Wentrup ◽  
J. Peters ◽  
G. Naros ◽  
J. Hill ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document