scholarly journals An Empirical Analysis of Bitcoin Price Jump Risk

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naeyoung Kang ◽  
Jungmu Kim

Given that there are both continuous and discontinuous components in the movement of asset prices, existing asset pricing models that assume only continuous price movements should be revised. In this paper, we explore the features of jumps, which are discontinuous movements, by examining Bitcoin pricing. First, we identify jumps in the Bitcoin price on a daily basis, applying a non-parametric methodology and then break down the Bitcoin total rate of return into a jump rate of return and a continuous rate of return. In our empirical analysis, price jumps turn out to be independent of volatility. Moreover, the jumps in the Bitcoin price do not appear at regular intervals; rather, they tend to be concentrated in clusters during special periods, implying that once an economic crisis occurs, the crisis will last for a long time due to contagion effects and the economy will take a considerable amount of time to recover fully. Further, the contribution of the jump rate of return to the total rate of return of the Bitcoin price is lower than the contribution of the continuous return, implying that the pursuit of sustainable returns rather than large but temporary returns will improve the total rate of return over the long term. Finally, more jumps are observed when trading volume is lower, implying that market illiquidity drives discontinuous movement in asset prices. Overall, the features of jump risk are like two sides of the same coin and jump risks are expected to have a significant effect on asset pricing, suggesting that consideration of jumps is essential for risk management as well as asset pricing.

2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank H. Westerhoff

We seek to develop a novel asset pricing model with heterogeneous traders. Fundamental traders expect that asset prices converge towards their intrinsic values, whereas chart traders rely on both price and volume signals to determine their orders. To be precise, the larger the trading volume, the more they believe in the persistence of the current price trend. Simulations of our nonlinear deterministic model reveal that interactions between fundamentalists and chartists may cause intricate endogenous price fluctuations. Contrary to the intuition, we find that chart trading may increase market stability.


Risks ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Patrick Beissner

This paper considers fundamental questions of arbitrage pricing that arises when the uncertainty model incorporates ambiguity about risk. This additional ambiguity motivates a new principle of risk- and ambiguity-neutral valuation as an extension of the paper by Ross (1976) (Ross, Stephen A. 1976. The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory 13: 341–60). In the spirit of Harrison and Kreps (1979) (Harrison, J. Michael, and David M. Kreps. 1979. Martingales and arbitrage in multiperiod securities markets. Journal of Economic Theory 20: 381–408), the paper establishes a micro-economic foundation of viability in which ambiguity-neutrality imposes a fair-pricing principle via symmetric multiple prior martingales. The resulting equivalent symmetric martingale measure set exists if the uncertain volatility in asset prices is driven by an ambiguous Brownian motion.


10.3386/w8311 ◽  
2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Lo ◽  
Harry Mamaysky ◽  
Jiang Wang

1998 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Biais ◽  
Peter Bossaerts

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiguo He ◽  
Arvind Krishnamurthy

Intermediary asset pricing understands asset prices and risk premia through the lens of frictions in financial intermediation. Perhaps motivated by phenomena in the financial crisis, intermediary asset pricing has been one of the fastest-growing areas of research in finance. This article explains the theory behind intermediary asset pricing and, in particular, how it is different from other approaches to asset pricing. This article also covers selective empirical evidence in favor of intermediary asset pricing.


2004 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. 1054-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew W. Lo ◽  
Harry Mamaysky ◽  
Jiang Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document