Metallic coatings - Corrosion test method for decorative chrome plating under a de-icing salt environment

2022 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 365 ◽  
pp. 278-284
Author(s):  
Hisao Fujikawa ◽  
H. Iwamura ◽  
M. Uramoto

Nitriding treatment is well known as one of the corrosion protection methods for steels as well as a way to prevent wear and fatigue. Initially, salt bath nitrocarburizing was popular, but recently, gas nitriding, gas nitrocarburizing, plasma nitriding and so on have come to be used more often because of their superior nitriding ability. In the case of nitriding, only nitrogen (N) diffuses into the steel, but in the case of nitrocarburizing, both nitrogen and carbon (C) diffuse into the steel. General speaking, nitriding includes all the treatments mentioned above. The corrosion behavior of nitride carbon steels has been understood mainly by salt bath or gas nitrocarburizing treatments1)-4).However, recently, nitriding is mainly applied to parts for things such as automobiles which need protection from wear and fatigue, and is seldom used for parts which need corrosion resistance. The present paper is to remind researchers again that nitrided steels show good corrosion resistance.Therefore, the comparison of various thicknesses of nitride layers as well as the comparison between nitride layers on steel has been carried out in this examination, using the salt spray corrosion test method. The effect of oxidation treatment after nitriding was also investigated.


1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-174
Author(s):  
James G. Bennett ◽  
Stephen L. Kessel ◽  
Charles E. Rogers

This is the third in a series of papers to investigate corrosivity test methods published by the Polyolefins Fire Performance Council, an operating unit of The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. In the first paper, 24 polymeric materials were evaluated for smoke corrosivity following the "Stan dard Test Method for Measuring the Corrosive Effect of Smoke from the Burn ing or Decomposition of Materials and Products" proposed by ASTM E05.21.70 which uses a radiant combustion/exposure apparatus. The second paper dis cussed the evaluation of the same 24 materials using the CNET corrosion test method "Plastics-Smoke Generation-Determination of the Corrosivity of Fire Effluents (Static Method)" under consideration by ISO TC61/SC4/WG2 and IEC TC89/WG3 and compared the CNET combustion results with the ASTM E05.21.70 results. In this paper, the 24 polymeric materials were evaluated us ing a modified "Testing of Cables, Wires and Flexible Cords; Corrosivity of Combustion Gases DIN 57 472 Part 813 Standard" acid gas test method and the results are compared to the previous ASTM E05.21.70 and CNET results. These commercially available polymeric materials cover a broad range of com positions used for wire and cable insulation and jacketing. The samples were decomposed in a modified DIN apparatus under dynamic conditions and the combustion gases were absorbed in a water trap where the pH and the conductivity were measured. The DIN apparatus was modified by the addition of gas dispersion frits for improved absorption of the combustion gases in the aqueous solution. The acid content of the aqueous solutions was determined using a silver nitrate/ammonium thiocyanate Volhard titration. The data demonstrate that the modified DIN test method using these indirect determinations of corrosive potential does differentiate polymeric materials, ranking them in a similar order to the ASTM E05.21.70 test method. Little cor relation with the CNET % Corrosivity Factor "COR" was found. Reasons for these differences are discussed. To complete the review of corrosion test methods, studies are under way to evaluate these same 24 materials with the "Fire Response Standard for Deter mining the Corrosive Effect of Combustion Products Using a Cone Corro simeter" proposed by ASTM D09.21.04.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document