Faculty Opinions recommendation of Efficacy and safety of regional citrate anticoagulation in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Author(s):  
Michael Joannidis
2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 234-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guntulu Sık ◽  
Asuman Demirbuga ◽  
Agageldi Annayev ◽  
Agop Citak

Objectives: Anticoagulation is used to prevent filter clotting in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy. Regional citrate anticoagulation is associated with lower rates of bleeding complications and prolongs the filter life span; however, a number of metabolic side effects had been associated with this therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect and safety of citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill children. Methods: A retrospective comparative cohort study. Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine. Results: From August 2016 to August 2018, 45 patients (19 in the citrate group and 26 in the heparin group) were included. A total of 101 hemofilters were used in all therapies: 44 in the citrate group (total continuous renal replacement therapy time: 2699 h) and 57 in the heparin group (total continuous renal replacement therapy time: 2383 h). The median circuit lifetime was significantly longer for regional citrate anticoagulation (53.0; interquartile range, 40–70 h) than for heparin anticoagulation (40.25; interquartile range, 22.75–53.5 h; p = 0.025). Mortality rates were similar in both groups (31.58% vs 30.77%). The most common indication for dialysis was hypervolemia in both groups. Transfusion rates were 1.65 units (interquartile range, 0.5–2.38) with heparin and 0.8 units (interquartile range, 0.3–2.0) with citrate (p = 0.32). Clotting-related hemofilter failure occurred in 11.36% of filters in the citrate group compared with 26.31% of filters in the heparin group. Conclusion: Our study showed that citrate is superior in terms of safety and efficacy, with longer filter life span. Regional citrate should be considered as a better anticoagulation method than heparin for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill children.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Wiegele ◽  
Lukas Infanger ◽  
Conrad Lacom ◽  
Stefan Koch ◽  
Andreas Baierl ◽  
...  

Background: To investigate pro- and anticoagulant alterations in uremic critically ill patients prior to and during continuous renal replacement therapy. In addition to the conventional thrombin generation assay (TGA), we performed a thrombomodulin-modified variant to better elucidate procoagulant imbalances. Platelet function was determined via multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) to round off hemostatic analysis.Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients at surgical intensive care units (ICU) with acute kidney injury undergoing continuous veno-venous hemodialysis using regional citrate anticoagulation. TGA and platelet function testing were performed at baseline (≤ 12 h prior to continuous renal replacement therapy) and on 3 consecutive days (day A–C) of extracorporeal therapy.Results: We did not observe significant changes in thrombin generation after start or during renal replacement therapy. Ratios of endogenous thrombin potential in patients were significantly increased (p < 0.001) compared to standardized plasma of healthy donors confirming the assumed procoagulant alterations in ICU patients. Test results of the conventional TGA differed significantly (p < 0.05) from those of the thrombomodulin-modified assay. The area under the curve remained below MEA reference values during the entire observation period, indicating a persistent reduction in platelet function.Conclusion: In summary, in-depth analysis using standard and modified TGA, as well as calculation of endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) ratios, revealed no further aggravation of the procoagulatory shift in the critically ill patient during CVVHD using regional citrate anticoagulation. MEA ruled out the potential impact of platelets.Clinical Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00004336), 29 August 2012; www.drks.de.


Kidney360 ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 10.34067/KID.0004912020
Author(s):  
Javier A. Neyra ◽  
Lenar Yessayan ◽  
Melissa L. Thompson Bastin ◽  
Keith Wille ◽  
Ashita J Tolwani

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the preferred dialysis modality for solute management, acid-base stability, and volume control in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit (ICU). CRRT offers multiple advantages over conventional hemodialysis in the critically ill population such as greater hemodynamic stability, better fluid management, greater solute control, lower bleeding risk and a more continuous (physiologic) approach of kidney support. Despite its frequent use, several aspects of CRRT delivery are still not fully standardized or do not have solid evidence-based foundations. In this manuscript, we provide a case-based review and recommendations of common scenarios and interventions encountered during the provision of CRRT to critically ill patients. Specific focus is made on initial prescription, CRRT dosing, and adjustments related to severe hyponatremia management, concomitant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, dialysis catheter placement, use of regional citrate anticoagulation and antibiotic dosing. This case-driven simulation is made as the clinical status of the patient evolves and is based on step-wise decisions made during the care of this patient according to specific patient's needs and the logistics available at the corresponding institution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document