Faculty Opinions recommendation of Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries.

Author(s):  
Watson Bowes
2006 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 1226-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Silver ◽  
Mark B. Landon ◽  
Dwight J. Rouse ◽  
Kenneth J. Leveno ◽  
Catherine Y. Spong ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Matthew K. Janssen ◽  
Steven J. Ralston

The article provides a review of a landmark study characterizing the risk of repeat cesarean deliveries. This multicenter prospective cohort study of over 30,000 cesarean deliveries demonstrates that risks of cesarean delivery increase sequentially, even in the absence of placenta accreta. The most dramatic increase is noted in the high rates of accreta with placenta previa and multiple cesarean deliveries, greater than 40% with 3 of more cesarean deliveries. This review highlights the key findings, methodology, and impact of this landmark study. It discusses other studies that continue to verify these results as well as contextualize them in the management of placenta accreta with developing centers of excellence. Finally, the article provides a sample clinical case scenario that applies the findings of this study.


2020 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 120S
Author(s):  
Neggin Mokhtari ◽  
Tetsuya Kawakita ◽  
Einav Nachman ◽  
Andrew Haddad ◽  
Sara Naeem Iqbal

2011 ◽  
Vol 205 (3) ◽  
pp. 262.e1-262.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole E. Marshall ◽  
Rongwei Fu ◽  
Jeanne-Marie Guise

Author(s):  
Rebecca Klahr ◽  
Kevin Cheung ◽  
Emily S. Markovic ◽  
Mackenzie Naert ◽  
Andrei Rebarber ◽  
...  

Objective This study aimed to estimate the association between adverse maternal outcomes and the number of repeated cesarean deliveries (CDs) in a single obstetrical practice. Study Design Retrospective cohort study of all CDs between 2005 and 2020 in a single maternal fetal medicine practice. We used electronic records to get baseline characteristics and pregnancy/surgical outcomes based on the number of prior CDs. We performed two subgroup analyses for women with and without placenta previa. Chi-square for trend and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used. Results A total of 3,582 women underwent CD and met inclusion criteria. Of these women, 1,852 (51.7%) underwent their first cesarean, 950 (26.5%) their second, 382 (10.7%) their third, 191 (5.3%) their fourth, 117 (3.3%) their fifth, and 84 (2.3%) their sixth or higher CDs. The incidence of adverse outcomes (placenta accreta, uterine window, uterine rupture, hysterectomy, blood transfusion, cystotomy, bowel injury, need for a ventilator postpartum, intensive care unit admission, wound complications, thrombosis, reoperation, and maternal death) increased with additional CDs. However, the absolute rates remained low. In women without a placenta previa, the likelihood of adverse outcome did not differ across groups. In women with a placenta previa, adverse outcomes increased with increasing CDs. However, the incidence of placenta previa did not increase with increasing CDs (<5% in each group). The incidence of a uterine dehiscence increased significantly with additional CDs: first, 0.2%; second, 2.0%; third, 6.6%; fourth, 10.3%; fifth, 5.8%; and sixth or higher, 10.4% (p < 0.001). Conclusion Maternal morbidity increases with CDs, but the absolute risks remain low. For women without placenta previa, increasing CDs is not associated with maternal morbidity. For women with placenta previa, risks are highest, but the incidence of placenta previa does not increase with successive CDs. The likelihood of uterine dehiscence increases significantly with increasing CDs which should be considered when deciding about timing of delivery in this population. Key Points


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document