Faculty Opinions recommendation of Neuroscience and the correct level of explanation for understanding mind. An extraterrestrial roams through some neuroscience laboratories and concludes earthlings are not grasping how best to understand the mind-brain interface.

Author(s):  
Cheryl Grady ◽  
Douglas Garrett
Neurology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan K. Percy ◽  
Charles B. Nemeroff

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e0137303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Stocco ◽  
Chantel S. Prat ◽  
Darby M. Losey ◽  
Jeneva A. Cronin ◽  
Joseph Wu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Martin V. Butz ◽  
Esther F. Kutter

With the motivation to develop computational and algorithmic levels of understanding how the mind comes into being, this chapter considers computer science, artificial intelligence, and cognitive systems perspectives. Questions are addressed, such as what ‘intelligence’ may actually be and how, and when an artificial system may be considered to be intelligent and to have a mind on its own. May it even be alive? Out of these considerations, the chapter derives three fundamental problems for cognitive systems: the symbol grounding problem, the frame problem, and the binding problem. We show that symbol-processing artificial systems cannot solve these problems satisfactorily. Neural networks and embodied systems offer alternatives. Moreover, biological observations and studies with embodied robotic systems imply that behavioral capabilities can foster and facilitate the development of suitably abstracted, symbolic structures. We finally consider Alan Turing’s question “Can machines think?” and emphasize that such machines must at least solve the three considered fundamental cognitive systems problems. The rest of the book addresses how the human brain, equipped with a suitably-structured body and body–brain interface, manages to solve these problems, and thus manages to develop a mind.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter DeScioli

AbstractThe target article by Boyer & Petersen (B&P) contributes a vital message: that people have folk economic theories that shape their thoughts and behavior in the marketplace. This message is all the more important because, in the history of economic thought, Homo economicus was increasingly stripped of mental capacities. Intuitive theories can help restore the mind of Homo economicus.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeannette Littlemore
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document