Faculty Opinions recommendation of Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate can improve the predictive value of the urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 test in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and a previous negative biopsy.

Introduction: High-resolution micro-ultrasound has the capability of imaging prostate cancer based on detecting alterations in ductal anatomy, analogous to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). This technology has the potential advantages of relatively low cost, simplicity, and accessibility compared to mpMRI. This multicenter, prospective registry aims to compare the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of mpMRI with high-resolution micro-ultrasound imaging for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Methods: We included 1040 subjects at 11 sites in seven countries who had prior mpMRI and underwent ExactVu micro-ultrasound-guided biopsy. Biopsies were taken from both mpMRI targets (PI-RADS >3 and micro-ultrasound targets (PRIMUS >3). Systematic biopsies (up to 14 cores) were also performed. Various strategies were used for mpMRI target sampling, including cognitive fusion with micro-ultrasound, separate software-fusion systems, and software-fusion using the micro-ultrasound FusionVu system. Clinically significant cancer was those with Gleason grade group ≥2. Results: Overall, 39.5% were positive for clinically significant prostate cancer. Micro-ultrasound and mpMRI sensitivity was 94% vs. 90%, respectively (p=0.03), and NPV was 85% vs. 77%, respectively. Specificities of micro-ultrasound and MRI were both 22%, with similar PPV (44% vs. 43%). This represents the initial experience with the technology at most of the participating sites and, therefore, incorporates a learning curve. Number of cores, diagnostic strategy, blinding to MRI results, and experience varied between sites. Conclusions: In this initial multicenter registry, micro-ultrasound had comparable or higher sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer compared to mpMRI, with similar specificity. Micro-ultrasound is a low-cost, single-session option for prostate screening and targeted biopsy. Further larger-scale studies are required for validation of these findings.

Download Full-text

Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

European Urology ◽

10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.048 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 78 (3) ◽

pp. 402-414 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Niranjan J. Sathianathen ◽

Altan Omer ◽

Eli Harriss ◽

Lucy Davies ◽

Veeru Kasivisvanathan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽

Prostate Cancer ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Magnetic Resonance ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Resonance Imaging ◽

Prostate Imaging ◽

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽

Clinically Significant

Download Full-text

The decision of targeted, systematic or combined biopsy in a biopsy naïve patient for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, can be made on the basis of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

Journal of Clinical Urology ◽

10.1177/2051415819889552 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 13 (3) ◽

pp. 198-204

Author(s):

Debashis Sarkar ◽

Debashis Nandi ◽

Sameer Gangoli ◽

James Hicks ◽

Paul Carter

Keyword(s):

Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽

Prostate Cancer ◽

Magnetic Resonance ◽

Current Trend ◽

Specific Antigen ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Resonance Imaging ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Naive Patient ◽

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Introduction: The current trend to implement multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided targeted biopsy (TB) as primary biopsy for the diagnosis of suspected prostate cancer and to avoid systematic biopsy (SB) is growing. However, concern remains regarding missing clinically significant (Cs) cancer on the normal mpMRI areas of the prostate. Therefore, we compared the normal and abnormal areas from mpMRI at the same prostate biopsy, using simultaneous SB and TB technique. Methods: A prospective, comparative effectiveness study included 134 patients initially referred for primary biopsy (from October 2017 to June 2018); 100 men were selected, mean age 68 years, with a median level of prostate specific antigen of 7.6, with average prostate volume of 52 cm3 (T3 disease and prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score < 3 were excluded). All underwent six cores TB (median), from an average of two lesions on mpMRI and also eight cores SB (median) from normal mpMRI areas of the prostate after informed consent. Results: The combined (SB + TB) biopsy cancer detection rate was 67%, 51% having Cs disease. For Cs cancer, 35 patients were detected by both techniques. TB missed four Cs cancer (95% confidence interval (CI), p < 0.0001). Fewer men in the TB group than in the SB group were found to have clinically insignificant (Ci) cancer (95% CI, p < 0.0001). No Cs cancer diagnosis was missed on TB from PI-RADS 5 lesion. Overall, 4% Cs cancers were missed on TB and avoided over diagnosis of 9% Ci cancer. Conclusions: Cognitive TB didn’t miss any Cs cancer from PI-RADS 5 lesion found on mpMRI. Only doing Cognitive TB on PI-RADS 5 lesion would save time, reduce workload and will be cost effective both for Urology and Pathology. PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions on mpMRI will benefit from adding systematic samples. Level of evidence: 4 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM).

Download Full-text