Faculty Opinions recommendation of Acquired rectourethral fistulas in adults: a systematic review of surgical repair techniques and outcomes.

Author(s):  
Sanjay Kulkarni ◽  
Pankaj Joshi
2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
W Eichinger ◽  
CC Badiu ◽  
I Hettich ◽  
DJ Ruzicka ◽  
A Hutter ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Ioannidou ◽  
J Bosdou ◽  
D Papanikolaou ◽  
D Goulis ◽  
A Lambropoulos ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Does oral antioxidant supplementation improve sperm quality in infertile men with varicocele who have not undergone surgical repair? Summary answer Oral antioxidant supplementation improves sperm concentration and motility in infertile men with varicocele who have not undergone surgical repair. What is known already: Benefit from oral antioxidant supplementation has been shown in infertile men with varicocele following surgical repair. Similarly, oral antioxidant supplementation has been suggested in infertile men with varicocele who have not undergone surgical repair. However, its effect currently remains controversial. Study design, size, duration A literature search was performed until January 2021 aiming to identify prospective studies evaluating the use of oral antioxidant supplementation alone or in combination in men with varicocele who have not undergone surgical repair. Participants/materials, setting, methods Seven prospective studies were identified, published between 1987 and 2018, including 278 infertile men with varicocele who had not undergone surgical repair. The number of patients included ranged from 20 to 65. Sperm analysis, evaluating sperm concentration, motility and morphology was performed in these studies before and after oral antioxidant supplementation. Meta-analysis of weighted data was performed using random effects model. Results are reported as weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Main results and the role of chance Seven studies were included in the systematic review. Oral antioxidant supplementation was performed by a combination of pentoxifylline, zinc and folic acid (single study), a combination of l-carnitine, fumarate, acetyl-l-carnitine, fructose, CoQ, vitamin C, zinc, folic acid and vitamin B12 (single study), a combination of L-Carnitine, vitamin C, coenzyme Q10, vitamin E, vitamin B9, vitamin B12, zinc , and selenium, l-carnitine (single study), or sole treatment with acetyl-l-carnitine (single study), L-Carnitine (single study), Coenzyme Q10 (single study) or zinc sulfate (single study). For the purpose of meta-analysis, the effect of oral antioxidant supplementation was evaluated after three months of treatment. Oral antioxidant supplementation significantly increased sperm concentration (WMD +5.65x106/ml 95% CI: +1.11 to + 10.12 p = 0.01, random effects model) and motility (WMD +4.30%, 95% CI: +0.86 to + 7.74 p = 0.01, random effects model) in infertile men with varicocele who had not undergone surgical repair. On the other hand, no significance difference was observed in sperm morphology (WMD +3.9%, 95% CI: –0.16 to + 8.04 p = 0.06, random effects model) and volume (WMD +0.53ml, 95% CI: 0.0 to + 1.0 p = 0.052, random effects model). Limitations, reasons for caution The number of relevant trials and that of patients included is small to allow for solid conclusions to be drawn. Moreover, although different oral antioxidants have been administered in infertile who had not undergone surgical repair, subgroup analysis was not feasible. Wider implications of the findings: Currently, limited evidence supports the use of oral antioxidants in the treatment of men with varicocele, who have not undergone surgical repair. Although the benefit in sperm concentration and motility appears to be modest, it might be important regarding achievement of pregnancy in these men. Trial registration number Not applicable


2018 ◽  
Vol 02 (04) ◽  
pp. 176-188
Author(s):  
Kyle Duchman ◽  
Ned Amendola ◽  
Joseph Buckwalter V

AbstractWhile uncommon, proximal hamstring injuries can result in significant pain and dysfunction, while also posing considerable treatment dilemmas due to the spectrum of injury that exists. Recent literature suggests that outcomes are improved with acute surgical repair of complete proximal hamstring avulsions, highlighting the importance of timely management of these unique injuries. While chronic repair or reconstruction can result in predictable improvements in pain and function postoperatively, the results are less predictable than acute surgical repair. Nonoperative management should be considered as the initial treatment strategy for patients with proximal hamstring tendinopathy or partial tears, as delayed surgical intervention in this setting has not been shown to significantly affect outcomes. Although current evidence is limited, evolving therapeutic techniques, including biologic injections and endoscopic repair techniques, need to be carefully evaluated to determine their role moving forward. This review aims to provide updated information on the relevant anatomy, mechanism of injury, diagnosis, and management of proximal hamstring injuries, with a specific focus on surgical indications, techniques, and outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document