Faculty Opinions recommendation of Split-dose picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid solution markedly enhances colon cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial.

Author(s):  
Venkataraman Subramanian
Digestion ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyoung Jun Kim ◽  
Tae Oh Kim ◽  
Bong Chul Shin ◽  
Jae Gon Woo ◽  
Eun Hee Seo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. AB97-AB98
Author(s):  
George Tribonias ◽  
Angeliki Theodoropoulou ◽  
Konstantinos G. Stylianou ◽  
Ioannis Giotis ◽  
Afroditi Mpitouli ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 691-697
Author(s):  
Kamran Ayub ◽  
Gyanprakash Ketwaroo ◽  
Suhaib Abudayyeh ◽  
Abeer Ibrahim ◽  
Rhonda A Cole ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-339
Author(s):  
Mir Fahad Faisal ◽  
Badar Hasan ◽  
Aditya Gutta ◽  
An-Lin Cheng ◽  
Rajiv Chhabra

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628482110244
Author(s):  
Gautam N. Mankaney ◽  
Masakazu Ando ◽  
David N. Dahdal ◽  
Carol A. Burke

Background: Selecting a bowel preparation for patients with renal impairment or diabetes requires special consideration. We aimed to describe the effect of baseline renal impairment or diabetes on the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of low-volume sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid (SPMC) ready-to-drink oral solution bowel preparation. Methods: A post hoc secondary analysis was performed from a randomized, assessor-blinded study of SPMC oral solution bowel preparation in participants with mild or moderate baseline renal impairment or diabetes. Primary efficacy endpoint (‘responders’) was the proportion of participants with ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ ratings on a modified Aronchick Scale (AS). Secondary efficacy outcomes were the quality of ascending colon cleansing from the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), and selected results from the Mayo Clinic Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), adenoma detection, and laboratory evaluations. Results: Similar overall colon cleansing was demonstrated in the subgroups, with >85% of participants in any subgroup rated as responders by the AS, and >92% of participant responders by the BBPS. Most participants reported a tolerable bowel preparation, regardless of baseline renal impairment or diabetes history. Safety of SPMC oral solution was similar between all subgroups and the overall cohort. For the mild renal impairment, moderate renal impairment, and diabetes subgroups, respectively, commonly reported, drug-related AEs were nausea (2.6%, 5.3%, 1.4%) and headache (2.2%, 2.6%, 4.3%). Conclusions: Ready-to-drink SPMC oral solution demonstrated efficacious colon cleansing in patients with baseline mild/moderate renal impairment or diabetes, with a tolerable bowel preparation reported by most. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03017235


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ozaki ◽  
Takaomi Kessoku ◽  
Michihiro Iwaki ◽  
Takashi Kobayashi ◽  
Tsutomu Yoshihara ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Patients taking opioids are known to develop opioid-induced constipation (OIC), which reduces their quality of life (QOL). The aim of this study is to compare magnesium oxide to naldemedine and determine which is more effective in preventing OIC. Methods: This is a proof of concept, prospective, randomized controlled trial, that commenced in Japan in March 2018. Initially, a questionnaire-based survey will be conducted targeting adult cancer patients who had concomitantly commenced opioid and OIC prevention treatment. Patients will then be randomly allocated to magnesium oxide (500 mg, thrice daily) or naldemedine (0.2 mg, once daily) groups. Each drug will be orally administrated for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint is defined as any improvement in the Japanese version of Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (JPAC-QOL) scores from the baseline to 2 weeks of treatment. Discussion : The primary endpoint is changes in the JPAC-QOL scores from the baseline to 2 weeks of intervention. The key secondary endpoint will be changes in spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) at 2 and 12 weeks of intervention. This study will determine whether magnesium oxide or naldemedine is more effective for the prevention of OIC. Trial registration: This trial is registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000031891). Registered March 25, 2018, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000036408.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document