Faculty Opinions recommendation of Prognostic value of the pre-transplant diastolic pulmonary artery pressure-to-pulmonary capillary wedge pressure gradient in cardiac transplant recipients with pulmonary hypertension.

Author(s):  
Jean-Luc Vachiery
2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
LM Aitken

BACKGROUND: Monitoring of pulmonary artery pressure is an essential component of the care of critically ill patients. The conditions under which reliable measurements can be obtained must be clarified. OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) whether reliable measurements of pulmonary artery pressure can be obtained with patients in the right or left 60 degrees lateral position and (2) which characteristics of patients preclude obtaining reliable measurements. METHODS: One hundred five patients (65 cardiac surgery, 40 general medicine) with pulmonary artery catheters were enrolled in a prospective, stratified, quasi-experimental study. Subjects were repositioned from supine (head of bed elevated < 30 degrees with 1 pillow) to the left and right 60 degrees lateral positions. Systolic, diastolic, and mean pulmonary artery pressures and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were measured before and 5, 10, and 20 minutes after lateral repositioning. The zero reference was the phlebostatic axis when patients were supine and the dependent midclavicular line at the level of the fourth intercostal space when patients were in the lateral positions. RESULTS: In most patients, measurements obtained with patients in the lateral position differed significantly from measurements obtained with patients supine. None of the variables examined were reliable predictors of which patients would have these differences. More than 11% of the patients had clinically significant differences in addition to the statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: Reliable measurements of pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure cannot be obtained with patients in the 60 degrees lateral position.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Valentim Goncalves ◽  
T Pereira-Da-Silva ◽  
R Soares ◽  
L De Sousa ◽  
R Ilhao Moreira ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Despite being the gold-standard for hemodynamic assessment, right heart catheterization (RHC) was overcome by plasma B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) levels in daily clinical routine. However, in the first year after heart transplantation (HT), the relationship between BNP and adverse hemodynamics have yielded conflicting results. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate whether BNP values can be used to estimate adverse hemodynamics in the first year after HT. Methods Prospective study of consecutive RHC performed in the first year after HT (according to the endomyocardial biopsies program). Plasma BNP levels were measured at the same day. The area under the curve (AUC) was analysed to find the BNP values with higher sensitivity and specificity to detect adverse hemodynamics. Results From 2017 to 2018, 50 RHC were performed. Mean age was 48.7 ± 8.3 years, with mean BNP value of 964.4 ± 1114.7pg/ml. Prediction of adverse hemodynamics by AUC results are represented in the table. BNP values were significantly increased in patients with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) >12mmHg (p < 0.001), cardiac index <2.5L/min/m2 (p = 0.001), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥25mmHg (p < 0.001), pulmonary vascular resistance > 1,5WU (p = 0.044) and right atrial pressure >5mmHg (p = 0.003). BNP >500pg/ml had a sensitivity of 78.3% and 87.5% and a specificity of 76.0% and 67.7% to detect PCWP >12mmHg and mPAP ≥25mmHg, respectively. Conclusion Significant associations were found between BNP values and adverse hemodynamics in RHC, supporting the clinical utility of BNP in the first year after HT. BNP prediction AUC values SR HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS AUC p 95% CI Best BNP value Sensitivity Specificity Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) > 12mmHg 0.798 <0.001 0.671-0.925 > 500pg/ml 78.3% 76.0% Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥ 25mmHg 0.830 <0.001 0.714-0.946 > 500pg/ml 87.5% 67.7% Cardiac output < 4L/min 0.833 0.002 0.667-1.000 > 1500pg/ml 77.8% 87.5% Cardiac index (CI) < 2.5L/min/m2 0.810 0.001 0.663-0.957 > 1150pg/ml 76.9% 86.1% Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 1,5WU 0.678 0.044 0.509-0.848 > 200pg/ml 83.3% 47.1% Right atrial pressure (RAP) > 5mmHg 0.744 0.003 0.607-0.880 > 500pg/ml 70.8% 65.4% BNP prediction


Author(s):  
Robert MacKenzie-Ross ◽  
Karen K. K. Sheares ◽  
Joanna Pepke-Zaba

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a haemodynamic and pathophysiological condition defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mm Hg at rest, assessed by right-heart catheterization (8–20 mm Hg is considered normal). A pulmonary capillary wedge pressure measurement of >15 mm Hg indicates a significant pulmonary venous component. PH is associated with a variety of causes. The current PH classification is helpful in understanding the different etiological, pathological, and treatment approaches.


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 186-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Poch ◽  
Victor Pretorius

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mm Hg and pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤15 mm Hg in the presence of occlusive thrombi within the pulmonary arteries. Surgical pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) is considered the best treatment option for CTEPH.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document