Faculty Opinions recommendation of A new tool to evaluate the impact of chronic urticaria on quality of life: chronic urticaria quality of life questionnaire (CU-QoL).

Author(s):  
Gordon Sussman
Allergy ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 60 (8) ◽  
pp. 1073-1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Baiardini ◽  
M. Pasquali ◽  
F. Braido ◽  
F. Fumagalli ◽  
L. Guerra ◽  
...  

Allergy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (12) ◽  
pp. 2542-2544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilaria Baiardini ◽  
Salvatore Fasola ◽  
Marcus Maurer ◽  
Karsten Weller ◽  
Giorgio Walter Canonica ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 670-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catiussa Spode Brutti ◽  
Renan Rangel Bonamigo ◽  
Taciana Cappelletti ◽  
Gabriela Mynarski Martins-Costa ◽  
Ana Paula Salin Menegat

Attempted to evaluate and compare the impact on quality of life of occupational and non-occupational ACD and to identify the most frequently involved allergens. A quality of life questionnaire was applied. We noted moderate impact on the quality of life of both groups, without a statistical difference. Our study corroborates previous general data on the prevalence of nickel sulphate and paraphenylenediamine as the most common allergens. Potassium bichromate was shown to be one of the main occupational allergens and thimerosal as the main non-occupational allergen in our sample.


2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 598-606
Author(s):  
Jovica Milovanovic ◽  
Dragoslava Andrejic ◽  
Ana Jotic ◽  
Vojko Djukic ◽  
Oliver Toskovic ◽  
...  

Backround/Aim. Considering the distinct increase in the incidence of oropharyngeal cancer over oral cavity cancers and changing epidemiology with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection emerging as an important risk factor, there is a need to establish better treatment choices in specific groups of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life (QOL) and functional performance and the impact of different demographical data, stage of disease, and treatment type on these parameters in patients with oropharyngeal cancer with successfully achieved locoregional control a year after the treatment. Methods. Study included 87 patients who underwent QOL and functional impairment assessment 12 to 14 months after finished oncological treatment with the following questionnaires: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of Life-Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of- Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck 35 (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) and The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Results. Specific groups of patients had significantly different post-treatment QOL scores. The factors associated with the worse QOL scores were female gender, not being in a partnership, level of education and HPV status. Conclusion. Clinicians should consider socioeconomic factors and HPV status in planning the recovery after treatment of patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. Gender, education level and employment are the variables that form a certain risk profiles associated with the lower QOL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document