Faculty Opinions recommendation of Neural mechanisms of incentive salience in naturalistic human vision.

Author(s):  
Kent Berridge
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clayton Hickey ◽  
Daniel Kaiser ◽  
Marius Peelen

Neuron ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 512-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clayton Hickey ◽  
Marius V. Peelen

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Xinhe Liu ◽  
Ning Wang ◽  
Lijia Gu ◽  
Jianyou Guo ◽  
Jinyan Wang ◽  
...  

The therapeutic goals of patients with chronic pain are not only to relieve pain but also to improve the quality of life. Chronic pain negatively affects various aspects of daily life, such as by decreasing the motivation to work and reward sensitivity, which may lead to difficulties in daily life or even unemployment. Human and animal studies have shown that chronic pain damages reward processing; the exploration of associated internal mechanisms may aid the development of treatments to repair this damage. Incentive salience theory, used widely to describe reward processing, divides this processing into “liking” (reward-induced hedonic sensory impact) and “wanting” (reward-induced motivation) components. It has been employed to explain pathological changes in reward processing induced by psychiatric disorders. In this review, we summarize the findings of studies of reward processing under chronic pain and examine the effects of chronic pain on “liking” and “wanting.” Evidence indicates that chronic pain compromises the “wanting” component of reward processing; we also discuss the neural mechanisms that may mediate this effect. We hope that this review aids the development of therapies to improve the quality of life of patients with chronic pain.


2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 1319-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Ashida ◽  
Angelika Lingnau ◽  
Matthew B. Wall ◽  
Andrew T. Smith

A key unresolved debate in human vision concerns whether we have two different low-level mechanisms for encoding image motion. Separate neural mechanisms have been suggested for first-order (luminance modulation) and second-order (e.g., contrast modulation) motion in the retinal image but a single mechanism could handle both. Human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has not so far convincingly revealed separate anatomical substrates. To examine whether two separate but co-localized mechanisms might exist, we used the technique of fast fMRI adaptation. We found direction-selective adaptation independently for each type of motion in the motion area V5/MT+ of the human brain. However, there was a total absence of cross-adaptation between first-order and second-order motion stimuli. This was true in both of the two subcomponents of MT+ (MT and MST) and similar results were found in V3A. This pattern of adaptation was consistent with psychophysical measurements of detection thresholds in similar stimulus sequences. The results provide strong evidence for separate neural populations that are responsible for detecting first- and second-order motion.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2560
Author(s):  
Jaclyn Dell ◽  
David Acunzo ◽  
Clayton Hickey

1976 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorrin A. Riggs
Keyword(s):  

1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-47
Author(s):  
Herman Bouma
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer T. Kubota ◽  
Tobias Brosch ◽  
Rachel Mojdehbakhsh ◽  
James S. Uleman ◽  
Elizabeth Phelps
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document