scholarly journals Decisões manipulativas como resultado da interpretação constitucional / Manipulative decisions as a result of constitutional interpretation

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 89323-89344
Author(s):  
Bruno Smolarek Dias ◽  
Leonardo Fratini Xavier De Souza ◽  
Sivonei Simas
2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind Dixon

A ‘functional’ approach to constitutional interpretation is well-accepted in many other jurisdictions, including the United States, and offers a promising middle path between the extremes of pure formalism and pragmatism. It is, however, under-developed as an approach to constitutional interpretation, rather than doctrine, in Australia. The article offers an exploration of what it would mean to adopt a more explicitly functionalist approach to the interpretation of the Constitution, drawing on constitutional cases decided by the High Court in 2014.


1990 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-112
Author(s):  
Peter H. Halewood

Is there the possibility of a critical standpoint from which to adjudicate the correctness or validity of constitutional interpretation? This basic question has been given considerable attention in contemporary constitutional theory and has been the focus of the pragmatist law as literature movement born of the interpretive turn in legal theory. At issue is the very purpose of constitutional practice: is it to recover the truth of a set of foundational, moral ideals from the constitution and apply it to a particular factual conflict? Or is it to preserve continuity between the various elements of our cultural practices, to keep the peace?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document