scholarly journals Feasibility and surgical technique of percutaneous transforaminal discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-95
Author(s):  
D. Ferdinandov
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Disc Herniations

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) is an alternative minimally invasive technique for the treatment of lumbosacral radicular syndrome resulting from lumbar disc herniation. The latter is performed with the help of local anesthesia and sedation in an awake patient with the advantage of direct feedback. Access to the target is lateral and follows a safe trajectory through the Kambin triangle. The main advantages of this surgical technique are the possibility of early discharge within 2 hours after its completion, negligible blood loss, lower risk of infectious complications, convenience in patients with obesity, reduced risk of epidural fibrosis. There are currently no large randomized trials of good quality demonstrating the advantage of PTED over open interlaminar access established in practice. In the worst case, endoscopic discectomy is not known to pose additional risks to patients. The operative technique with a clinical case and a discussion about the applicability of the new approach for the treatment of lumbar disc herniations are presented.

scholarly journals Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy in the treatment of multilevel disc herniations

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denglu Yan ◽  
Zaiheng Zhang ◽  
Zhi Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Discectomy ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage ◽  
Multiple Level ◽  
Endoscopic Procedures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Disc Herniations

Abstract Background There were no studies in literature of multiple level lumbar disc herniation treatment by endoscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic treatment multiple level lumbar disc herniation by compare to the one level disc herniation. Methods A total of 267 patients of lumbar disc herniation who had endoscopic surgery were categorized into three different groups depending on the level number of endoscopic procedures. 78 cases had one level procedure (OL group), 54 cases had couple level procedures (CL group), and 35 cases had triple level procedures (TL group). Endoscopic discectomy procedures was performed and the clinical outcomes were recorded. Results There was no intraoperative death in this series. The hospital day were no significant difference among three groups. The operational time and blood loss were biggest in triple levels procedures and lest in one level procedure. When take into the influence the numbers of disc herniation, there were no significant difference per level among three groups. The pain index and ODI score were better than preoperational in all patients, and there were no significant difference among three groups. The disk and foramen height, and lumbar lordosis were no significant difference compare to preoperative in all patients, and there were no significant difference among three groups. All patients achieved pain free accomplished all surgery procedures, no infection, and no dural tear of cerebrospinal fluid leakage complication. Conclusions Endoscopic lumbar discectomy was effective and safe procedures in the treatment of multilevel lumbar disc herniation.

scholarly journals Recurrent lumbar disc herniation

2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin R. Swartz ◽  
Gregory R. Trost
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Great Care ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Site Identification ◽  
Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

Recurrent lumbar disc herniation is a common disease process. It has been noted to occur in 5 to 15% of cases surgically treated for primary lumbar disc herniation. Outcomes in one series approached those after the initial operations, although this is not the case in the experience of most surgeons. The removal of recurrent lumbar disc herniations requires meticulous surgical technique. Great care is taken to identify the osseous margins of the previous surgical site. Identification and dissection of scar from the dura mater is greatly aided with the use of a microscope.

scholarly journals Comparison of quality of life between men and women who underwent Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

10.14444/4028 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stylianos Kapetanakis ◽  
Grigorios Gkasdaris ◽  
Tryfon Thomaidis ◽  
Georgios Charitoudis ◽  
Konstantinos Kazakos
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy

scholarly journals A Study of Lumbar Disc Herniation and Facet Joint Asymmetry

2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 87-94
Author(s):  
Qi Lai ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Runsheng Guo ◽  
Xin Lv ◽  
Qiang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Facet Joint ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Lower Lumbar Spine ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Facet Joint Degeneration ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Lumbar Facet

Purpose: To investigate the association of facet joint asymmetry with lumbar disc herniation at the lower lumbar spine. Methods: A total of 90 patients (ages 18–40 years) with single-level disc herniation (L3–L4, L4–L5, or L5–S1) were included in the study. Facet asymmetry was defined as a difference of 10° in facet joint angles between right and left sides. Normal discs in the same segment of other individuals were used as a control. Patients had facet asymmetry measured for L3 to S1 through 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging, and information was collected, including age, sex, degenerative degree of lumbar facet joints, and the presence or absence of lumbar disc herniation and type. Results: At the L3 to L4 level, 2 cases had facet asymmetry in 8 patients with lumbar disc herniation, compared with 17 cases of facet asymmetry in 82 patients without disc herniation (P = 0.7776, r = 0.030). At the L4 to L5 level, there were 21 cases of facet asymmetry in 45 patients with lumbar disc herniation, compared with 5 cases of asymmetry in 45 patients without disc herniation (P = 0.00019, r = 0.392). At the L5 to S1 level, there were 25 cases of facet asymmetry in 37 patients with lumbar disc herniation, compared with 11 cases of facet asymmetry in 53 patients without disc herniation (P = 0.0000, r = 0.492). There were 23 cases of facet asymmetry in 28 disc herniations of side type compared with 2 cases of facet asymmetry in 9 herniations of center type (P = 0.0008, r = 0.364). There was no significant difference in the relationship between age, facet joint degeneration, and lumbar facet joint asymmetry (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Facet asymmetry is significantly associated with lumbar disc herniation at the L4 to L5 and the L5 to S1 levels, whereas there is an obvious association with the side type of lumbar disc herniation at the L5 to S1 level.

scholarly journals Genotypic and Antimicrobial Characterisation ofPropionibacterium acnesIsolates from Surgically Excised Lumbar Disc Herniations

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jess Rollason ◽  
Andrew McDowell ◽  
Hanne B. Albert ◽  
Emma Barnard ◽  
Tony Worthington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Herniated Disc ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Type Ia ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Typing Methods ◽  
Human Infections ◽  
Clinical Conditions

The anaerobic skin commensalPropionibacterium acnesis an underestimated cause of human infections and clinical conditions. Previous studies have suggested a role for the bacterium in lumbar disc herniation and infection. To further investigate this, five biopsy samples were surgically excised from each of 64 patients with lumbar disc herniation.P. acnesand other bacteria were detected by anaerobic culture, followed by biochemical and PCR-based identification. In total, 24/64 (38%) patients had evidence ofP. acnesin their excised herniated disc tissue. UsingrecAand mAb typing methods, 52% of the isolates were type II (50% of culture-positive patients), while type IA strains accounted for 28% of isolates (42% patients). Type III (11% isolates; 21% patients) and type IB strains (9% isolates; 17% patients) were detected less frequently. The MIC values for all isolates were lowest for amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, rifampicin, tetracycline, and vancomycin (≤1mg/L). The MIC for fusidic acid was 1-2 mg/L. The MIC for trimethoprim and gentamicin was 2 to ≥4 mg/L. The demonstration that type II and III strains, which are not frequently recovered from skin, predominated within our isolate collection (63%) suggests that the role ofP. acnesin lumbar disc herniation should not be readily dismissed.

Comparison of Outcomes Postoperation between Straight Leg Raising Test Negative and Positive Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feilong Wei ◽  
Haoran Gao ◽  
Yifang Yuan ◽  
Shu Qian ◽  
Quanyou Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Straight Leg Raising ◽  
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Relevant Factors

Abstract Background: Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy is used increasingly in patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation. There is little knowledge on the related factors including SLR test influencing the operation. Therefore, we designed this prospective study to explore the relevant factors influencing postoperative effect of PTED surgery.Methods: Consecutive patients with LDH who came to our hospital from August 2015 to September 2016 and received PTED surgery. 4 kinds of scales including VAS (lumbar/leg), ODI and JOA were measured and reassessed at 1 day, 3 months, 6 months, 12months and 36 months after the PTED to assess their surgical outcomes. Results: All the patients had successful surgery. ODI and VAS (lumbar/leg) decreased in all patients and groups. And there was a statistically significant difference in each postoperative follow-up compared with that before surgery in every visit. In addition, the increase of JOA in postoperation was statistically significant compared with that before surgery. And, there is statistically significant difference between the three subpopulations (patients with SLR Positive (0°-30°), SLR Positive (31°-60°) and SLR Negative (61°-) in the changes of the scores of VAS(leg), ODI and JOA. However, there is no statistically significant difference between the three subpopulations (patients with SLR Positive (0°-30°), SLR Positive (31°-60°) and SLR Negative (61°--RRB- in the changes of the score of VAS(lumbar). Conclusions: PTED showed great effect on treating patients with lumbar disc herniation. And the main scale score such as VAS(leg). ODI and JOA showed that there is a statistically significant difference between the three subpopulations treated by PTED. Patients with SLR negative may get greater benefit from PTED.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document