scholarly journals On the generic triangle group and the free metabelian group of rank 2

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 653-676
Author(s):  
Stefano Isola ◽  
Riccardo Piergallini
1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 468-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Evans

AbstractLet F3 denote the free group of rank 3 and M2 denote the free metabelian group of rank 2. We say that x * F3 is a primitive element of F3 if it can be included a in some basis of F3. We establish the existence of presentations such that N does not contain any primitive elements of F3.


1994 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 298-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. K. Gupta ◽  
N. D. Gupta ◽  
G. A. Noskov

AbstractFor any variety of groups, the relative inner rank of a given groupG is defined to be the maximal rank of the -free homomorphic images of G. In this paper we explore metabelian inner ranks of certain one-relator groups. Using the well-known Quillen-Suslin Theorem, in conjunction with an elegant result of Artamonov, we prove that if r is any "Δ-modular" element of the free metabelian group Mn of rank n > 2 then the metabelian inner rank of the quotient group Mn/(r) is at most [n/2]. As a corollary we deduce that the metabelian inner rank of the (orientable) surface group of genus k is precisely k. This extends the corresponding result of Zieschang about the absolute inner ranks of these surface groups. In continuation of some further applications of the Quillen-Suslin Theorem we give necessary and sufficient conditions for a system g = (g1,..., gk) of k elements of a free metabelian group Mn, k ≤ n, to be a part of a basis of Mn. This extends results of Bachmuth and Timoshenko who considered the cases k = n and k < n — 3 respectively.


1971 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-454
Author(s):  
S. V. Modak

It is well known that the wreath product of two ordered groups is an ordered group. In [2] Fuchs asks if the same is true for O*-groups. Here we construct an example to show that the wreath product of an infinite cyclic group with a free metabelian group is not an O*-group.


1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Chapuis

In 1965, during the first All-Union Symposium on Group Theory, Kargapolov presented the following two problems: (a) describe the universal theory of free nilpotent groups of class m; (b) describe the universal theory of free groups (see [18, 1.28 and 1.27]). The first of these problems is still open and it is known [25] that a positive solution of this problem for an m ≤ 2 should imply the decidability of the universal theory of the field of the rationals (this last problem is equivalent to Hilbert's tenth problem for the field of the rationals which is a difficult open problem; see [17] and [20] for discussions on this problem). Regarding the second problem, Makanin proved in 1985 that a free group has a decidable universal theory (see [15] for stronger results), however, the problem of deriving an explicit description of the universal theory of free groups is open. To try to solve this problem Remeslennikov gave different characterization of finitely generated groups with the same universal theory as a noncyclic free group (see [21] and [22] and also [11]). Recently, the author proved in [8] that a free metabelian group has a decidable universal theory, but the proof of [8] does not give an explicit description of the universal theory of free metabelian groups.


1993 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narain Gupta ◽  
Vladimir Shpilrain

Nielsen [14] gave the following commutator test for an endomorphism of the free group F = F2 = 〈x, y; Ø〉 to be an automorphism: an endomorphism ø: F → F is an automorphism if and only if the commutator [ø(x), ø(y)] is conjugate in F to [x, y]±1. He obtained this test as a corollary to his well-known result that every IA-automorphism of F (i.e. one which fixes F modulo its commutator subgroup) is an inner automorphism. Bachmuth et al. [4] have proved that IA-automorphisms of most two-generator groups of the type F/R′ are inner, and it becomes natural to ask if Nielsen's commutator test remains valid for those groups as well. Durnev[7] considered this question for the free metabelian group F/F″ and confirmed the validity of the commutator test in this case. Here we prove that Nielsen's test does not hold for a large class of F/R′ groups (Theorem 3·1) and, as a corollary, deduce that it does not hold for any non-metabelian solvable group of the form F/R″ (Corollary 3·2). In view of our Theorem 3·1, Nielsen's commutator test in these situations seems to have less appeal than his result that the IA-automorphisms of F are precisely the inner automorphisms of F. We explore some applications of this important result with respect to non-tameness of automorphisms of certain two- generator groups F/R (i.e. automorphisms of F/R which are not induced by those of the free group F). For instance, we show that a two-generator free polynilpotent group F/V, , has non-tame automorphisms except when V = γ2(F) or V = γ3(F), or when V is of the form [yn(U), γ(U)], n ≥ 2 (Theorem 4·2). This complements the results of [9] and [16] rather nicely, and is shown to follow from a more general result (Proposition 4·1). We also include an example of an endomorphism θ: x → xu, y→y of F which induces a non-tame automorphism of F/γ6(F) while the partial derivative ∂(u)/∂(x) is ‘balanced’in the sense of Bryant et al. [5] (Example 4·4). This gives an alternative solution of a problem in [5] which has already been resolved by Papistas [15] in the negative. In our final section, we consider groups of the type F/[R′,F] and, in contrast to groups of the type F/R′, we show that the Nielsen's commutator test does hold in most of these groups (Theorem 5·1). We conclude with a sufficiency condition under which Nielsen's commutator test is valid for a given pair of generating elements ofF modulo [R′,F] (Proposition 5·2).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document