COLLAGEN DRESSING VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DRESSINGS IN BURN AND CHRONIC WOUNDS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Objective: Biological dressings are water-resistant to bacteria, and generate the most physiological interfacebetween the wound surface and the environment. Collagen dressings have other superiority over conventional dressings in terms of ease of application and being natural, non-immunogenic, non-pyrogenic, hypoallergenic, and pain-free. Materials And Methods: The data of 120 patients with chronic wounds of diverse aetiologies and with signify age 43.7 years were accumulated and analyzed. The patients had been treated with collagen or other conventional dressing substance. The patients were split into two groups; 'Collagen group' and 'Conventional group', For the cause of comparison. 60 patients wereincluded in both groups. For assessment the wound characteristics in size, edge, oor, granulation tissue, and wound swab were recorded. With starting treatment, appearance of granulation tissue, completeness of healing, require for skin grafting, and patients' satisfaction was noted in both groups. Results: Sixty percentage of the 'collagen group' wounds and only forty-two percentage of the 'conventionalgroup' wounds were sterile (P=0.04) within two weeks of treatment. Healthy granulation tissue seemed earlier over collagen-dressed woundsthan over conventionally treated wounds (P=0.04). After eight weeks, (87%) of 'collagen group' wounds and (80%) of 'conventional group' wounds were >75% healed (P=0.21). In the 'collagen group' eight patients and twelvein the 'conventional group' required partial split-skin grafting (P=0.05). Collagen-treated patients enjoyed early. Conclusion: No remarkable better results were found in terms of complete of healing of burn andchronic wounds between collagen dressing and conventional dressing. Collagen dressing, however, mayavoid the require of skin grafting, and provides additional benet of patients' comfort.