scholarly journals On Neyman-Pearson optimality of binary neural net classifiers

Author(s):  
Raymond Veldhuis ◽  
Dan Zeng

<div><div><div><p>In classical binary statistical pattern recognition optimality in Neyman-Pearson sense, achieved by a (log) likelihood ratio based classifier, is often desirable. A drawback of a Neyman-Pearson optimal classifier is that it requires full knowledge of the (quotient of the) class-conditional probability densities of the input data, which is often unrealistic. The design of neural net classifiers is data driven, meaning that no explicit use is made of the class-conditional probability densities of the input data. In this paper a proof is presented that a neural net can also be trained to approximate a log-likelihood ratio and be used as a Neyman-Pearson optimal, prior-independent classifier. Properties of the approximation of the log-likelihood ratio are discussed. Examples of neural nets trained on synthetic data with known log-likelihood ratios as ground truth illustrate the results.</p></div></div></div>

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Veldhuis ◽  
Dan Zeng

<div><div><div><p>In classical binary statistical pattern recognition optimality in Neyman-Pearson sense, achieved by a (log) likelihood ratio based classifier, is often desirable. A drawback of a Neyman-Pearson optimal classifier is that it requires full knowledge of the (quotient of the) class-conditional probability densities of the input data, which is often unrealistic. The design of neural net classifiers is data driven, meaning that no explicit use is made of the class-conditional probability densities of the input data. In this paper a proof is presented that a neural net can also be trained to approximate a log-likelihood ratio and be used as a Neyman-Pearson optimal, prior-independent classifier. Properties of the approximation of the log-likelihood ratio are discussed. Examples of neural nets trained on synthetic data with known log-likelihood ratios as ground truth illustrate the results.</p></div></div></div>


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Serpil Ucar ◽  
Ceyhun Yukselir

This research was conducted to investigate how frequently Turkish advanced learners of English use the logical connector ‘thus’ in their academic prose and to investigate whether it was overused, underused or misused semantically in comparison to English native speakers. The data were collected from three corpora; Corpus of Contemporary American English and 20 scientific articles of native speakers as control corpora, and 20 scientific articles of Turkish advanced EFL learners. The raw frequencies, frequencies per million words, frequencies per text and log-likelihood ratio were measured so as to compare varieties across the three corpora. The findings revealed that Turkish learners of English showed underuse in the use of the connector ‘thus’ in their academic prose compared to native speakers. Additionally, they did not demonstrate misuse in the use of the connector ‘thus’. Nevertheless, non-native learners of English tended to use this connector in a resultative role (cause-effect relation) more frequently whereas native speakers used it in appositional and summative roles more as well as its resultative role. Furthermore, the most frequent occurrences of ‘thus’ have been in academic genre.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document