scholarly journals Idiopathic scoliosis. Mechanisms of development

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 628-635
Author(s):  
Late Serdyuk Valentyn Viktorovich ◽  
Serdiuk Oleksandr Valentinovich ◽  
Grigory Tishkin

Objective: One of the most complicated problems of Orthopaedics is the treatment of scoliosis. More than 90% of cases are attributable to Idiopathic deformation, the cause of which is unknown. We investigated the cause of pathogenesis of this disorder. Methods: At our institution more than 6900 patients aged 1-89 years have undergone inpatient and outpatient treatment in connection with spinal pain syndrome and different neurological disorders associated with idiopathic scoliosis. This study was undertaken between February 1996 and February 2010.  All patients had a clinical, radiography and laboratory examinations. Results: The 29.6% of patients were aged 31-50 years old. 60% were men and 40% were women. While examining patients with scoliosis deformation, we noted symptoms of body asymmetry i.e. different volumes of the right and left halves of face body and limbs. These features were typical for all patients irrespective of sex, age, and ethnic origin. 83,2% of patients had underdevelopment of the left part of the body, and only 16,8% of the right side. Analysis of published work in anatomy, physiology, neurophysiology, vertebrology, done simultaneously with analysis of the clinical material, allowed us to make some conclusions. Conclusions: First asymmetrical structure of the human body is based on laws of nature and is linked with difference of sizes of brain’s hemispheres, particularly of the right and left gyrus centralis anterior which controls the muscle’s function and our movements. Second asymmetrical tension of Erector spinae muscles, leads to inclination of the pelvis on a side of weak muscles; thus initiating development of the lateral spine curves. Since such a situation is typical for all people, this deformation is known as functional scoliosis. Third, further development of the bodies of vertebrae, their arches, processes, intervertebral discs, ligaments, and other anatomical elements in position of the deviation leads to one sided underdevelopment of these structures. As a result the areas of instability appear in each segment of spine ( neck, chest, lumbar and sacral areas ). Fourth, the  muscles in a growing body misbalance and on the ground of rotating movement, start rotatory dislocation of vertebrae in zones of instability in all parts of the spine. As a result torsion of the deformed wedge-shaped vertebrae leads to formation of the structural scoliosis. The rotation of the vertebrae, described above, does not depend on sex, age and ethnic origin of the patient and has a character of the natural development. Thus from our point of view, the term idiopathic scoliosis, must be changed to spinal muscle asymmetrical deformation of a reflex origin. Understanding of this rotation allowed us to establish an effective non-surgical method of treatment of scoliosis and spinal pain syndrome in patients of all ages.

Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Christelis ◽  
Brian Simpson ◽  
Marc Russo ◽  
Michael Stanton-Hicks ◽  
Giancarlo Barolat ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective For many medical professionals dealing with patients with persistent pain following spine surgery, the term failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) as a diagnostic label is inadequate, misleading and potentially troublesome. It misrepresents causation. Alternative terms have been suggested but none has replaced FBSS. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) published a revised classification of chronic pain, as part of the new International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), which has been accepted by the World Health Organization (WHO). This includes the term Chronic pain after spinal surgery (CPSS), which is suggested as a replacement for FBSS. Methods This article provides arguments and rationale for a replacement definition. In order to propose a broadly applicable yet more precise and clinically informative term, an international group of experts was established. Results 14 candidate replacement terms were considered and ranked. The application of agreed criteria reduced this to a shortlist of four. A preferred option – Persistent spinal pain syndrome – was selected by a structured workshop and Delphi process. We provide rationale for using Persistent spinal pain syndrome and a schema for its incorporation into ICD-11. We propose the adoption of this term would strengthen the new ICD-11 classification. Conclusions This project is important to those in the fields of pain management, spine surgery and neuromodulation, as well as patients labelled with FBSS. Through a shift in perspective it could facilitate the application of the new ICD-11 classification and allow clearer discussion amongst medical professionals, industry, funding organisations, academia, and the legal profession.


2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 261
Author(s):  
Sara Luetchford

1999 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-147
Author(s):  
E. I. Danilova ◽  
V. N. Grafova ◽  
M. L. Kukushkin ◽  
V. A. Zinkevich

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35
Author(s):  
E G Skryabin

Examination of 325 pregnants with spinal pain at different terms of gestation was performed. The nature, rate and main clinical manifestations of vertebral pathology are detected. Taking into account impossibility of radiologic examination the shady moire topography of posterior surface of trunk , which exerted no negative influence on fetus, was used for the diagnosis of spine deformity. Complex treatment with nondrug therapy allowed to eliminate or significantly decrease the spinal pain syndrome. Specially elaborated devices for the diagnosis and treatment of spinal diseases in pregnants were used.


Author(s):  
Philippe Rigoard ◽  
Amine Ounajim ◽  
Lisa Goudman ◽  
Benedicte Bouche ◽  
Manuel Roulaud ◽  
...  

While Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) provides satisfaction to almost 2/3 of Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome-Type 2 (PSPS-T2) patients implanted for refractory chronic back and/or leg pain when not adequately addressed the back pain component, leaves patients in a therapeutic cul-de-sac. Peripheral Nerve field Stimulation (PNfS) has shown interesting results addressing back pain in the same population. Far from placing these two techniques in opposition, we suggest that these approaches could be combined to better treat PSPS-T2 patients. We designed a RCT (CUMPNS), with a 12-month follow-up, to assess the potential added value of PNfS, as a salvage therapy, in PSPS-T2 patients experiencing a “Failed SCS Syndrome” in the back pain component. Fourteen patients were included in this study and randomized into 2 groups (“SCS + PNfS” group/n=6 vs “SCS only” group/n=8). The primary objective of the study was to compare the percentage of back pain surface decrease after 3 months, using a computerized interface to obtain quantitative pain mappings, combined with multi-dimensional SCS outcomes. Back pain surface decreased significantly greater for the ”SCS+PNfS” group (80.2% ± 21.3%) compared to the “SCS only” group (13.2% ± 94.8%) (p=0.012), highlighting the clinical interest of SCS+PNfS, in cases where SCS fails to address back pain.


1986 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-418
Author(s):  
G. N. Kryzhanovskii ◽  
N. G. Lutsenko ◽  
V. N. Grafova ◽  
E. I. Danilova ◽  
V. K. Lutsenko ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document