scholarly journals Integration of Groundwater Modelling with Mine Planning to Optimise Mine Closure Plans ⎯ The Marillana Creek (Yandi) Mine Story

Author(s):  
Jonathan Hall ◽  
Hugh Middlemis ◽  
Peter Waters ◽  
Kathryn Rozlapa
SEG Discovery ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 16-27
Author(s):  
Ed Holloway ◽  
Scott Cowie

Editor’s note: The Geology and Mining series, edited by Dan Wood and Jeffrey Hedenquist, is designed to introduce early-career professionals and students to a variety of topics in mineral exploration, development, and mining, in order to provide insight into the many ways in which geoscientists contribute to the mineral industry. Abstract Mine planning is the process that determines the way in which an ore deposit will be mined over the life of a mining operation. It necessarily draws on everything that planning engineers believe will determine the ultimate success of the proposed mine and uses as its foundation all of the geology-related data on the deposit. It is both a strategic and a tactical process that first considers a longer-term horizon based on strategic considerations, followed by more detailed shorter-term planning processes, in this order; the latter are the result of tactical considerations. This structured process may also be referred to as integrated mine planning, and it is driven by a broader corporate strategy or set of objectives. As such, it is much more than the mining engineering section of the mine development process. It has to include inputs from all related disciplines, by combining all of the measured properties of the deposit with mining-associated parameters. This results in the planning process incorporating a significant number of interrelated parameters. If these parameters are not used diligently and accurately or are not well aligned, or if the underlying data are deficient in either quantity or quality, the project or operation is unlikely to achieve its potential, by virtue of failures in the planning process. Best-practice integrated planning incorporates relevant inputs from all mining-related fields: geology, geotechnical, geochemical, hydrogeological, hydrology, mining operations, minerals processing, marketing of product, waste management, tailings, environmental, social science, mine closure, etc. It includes all interfaces in the business-value driver model, from exploration drill holes to the mine closure plan. The planning process cannot be completed successfully by mining engineers working in isolation from professionals in other key disciplines. Because geology provides the foundation on which the mine plan is built, the quality and accuracy of the geologic data provided to planning teams by exploration geoscientists is crucial.


2013 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila K. Conegundes de Jesus ◽  
Luis Enrique Sánchez

Aiming at deriving good practice recommendations for mine closure, this paper reviews the case of a kaolin mine whose production ceased more than ten years ago, but as yet didn't meet its completion criteria. Document review, interviews and site visits showed that: (i) rework was needed to satisfactorily implement land rehabilitation measures such as contouring, slope stabilization, erosion and sediment control and revegetation; (ii) underground water quality was affected during mine operation, causing the mine to be included in the State contaminated sites register. Despite being a small operation, the closure of this mine illustrates a number of problems faced by mining companies in planning and implementing mine closure measures: (1) lack of clear land rehabilitation objectives; (2) the need to manage liabilities related to contaminated sites; (3) loss of organizational memory. The research found that good practices, generally recommended in guidebooks, were not adopted by the company. The main lesson from this relatively simple case - a small mine situated near a dynamic and expanding urban area - are that decommissioning and closure cannot be a makeshift add-on to mine management; these are not trivial activities and require careful planning and integration with mine planning itself.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 26-39
Author(s):  
E.N. Kamnev ◽  
◽  
V.P. Karamushka ◽  
A.V. Seleznev ◽  
V.N. Morozov ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 34-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kalybekov ◽  
◽  
K.B. Rysbekov ◽  
A.A. Toktarov ◽  
O.M. Otarbaev ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document