scholarly journals Modeling and classifying variable width riparian zones utilizing digital elevation models, flood height data, digital soil data and national wetlands inventory : a new approach for riparian zone delineation

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinan A. Abood
2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 3851-3862 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Fernández ◽  
J. Barquín ◽  
M. Álvarez-Cabria ◽  
F. J. Peñas

Abstract. Riparian zone delineation is a central issue for managing rivers and adjacent areas; however, criteria used to delineate them are still under debate. The area inundated by a 50-yr flood has been indicated as an optimal hydrological descriptor for riparian areas. This detailed hydrological information is usually only available for populated areas at risk of flooding. In this work we created several floodplain surfaces by means of two different GIS-based geomorphological approaches using digital elevation models (DEMs), in an attempt to find hydrologically meaningful potential riparian zones for river networks at the river basin scale. Objective quantification of the performance of the two geomorphologic models is provided by analysing coinciding and exceeding areas with respect to the 50-yr flood surface in different river geomorphological types.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Schwanghart ◽  
Dirk Scherler

Abstract. The analysis of longitudinal river profiles is an important tool for studying landscape evolution. However, characterizing river profiles based on digital elevation models (DEM) suffers from errors and artifacts that particularly prevail along valley bottoms. The aim of this study is to characterize uncertainties that arise from the analysis of river profiles derived from different, near-globally available DEMs. We devised new algorithms – quantile carving and the CRS algorithm – that rely on quantile regression to enable hydrological correction and uncertainty quantification of river profiles. We find that globally available DEMs commonly overestimate river elevations in steep topography. The distributions of elevation errors become increasingly wider and right-skewed if adjacent hillslope gradients are steep. Our analysis indicates that the AW3D DEM has the highest precision and lowest bias for the analysis of river profiles in mountainous topography. The new 12-m resolution TanDEM-X DEM has a very low precision, most likely due to the combined effect of steep valley- walls and the presence of water surfaces in valley bottoms. Compared to the conventional approaches of carving and filling, we find that our new approach is able to reduce the elevation bias and errors in longitudinal river profiles.


2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 781-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Arnold

Calculation of flow accumulation (also known as upstream area) matrices from digital elevation models (DEMs) is a very common procedure in hydrological studies, and also has been used in other disciplines within physical geography, such as glaciology. A problem with such calculations has always been the presence of closed depressions in DEMs; flow is directed towards such areas, but then cannot ‘escape’. In many implementations of flow accumulation algorithms such depressions have been removed from the DEM with some form of pre-processing algorithm which typically transform depressions into flat areas, across which area can then be routed. This approach effectively assumes that all depressions in a DEM are therefore artifacts, and not true features within the landscape. The proliferation of very high quality, high precision, and fine spatial resolution DEMs in recent years means that such an assumption is increasingly difficult to support. In this paper, some of the main flow accumulation algorithms and some existing techniques for dealing with closed depressions in DEMs are reviewed. A new algorithm is presented which assumes that such depressions are real features in the landscape, and which allows them to ‘fill’ and then ‘overflow’ into downstream areas within the DEM. Examples with a synthetic and two real DEMs suggest that, at least in these cases, the assumption that depressions are real is justified. These results also suggest that determining the size distribution for depressions within a DEM could form the basis for identifying whether artifact depressions are a problem in individual DEMs.


10.1596/34445 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Croneborg ◽  
Keiko Saito ◽  
Michel Matera ◽  
Don McKeown ◽  
Jan van Aardt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document