Differences of Potassium Efficiency Characteristics and Root Morphology be-tween Two Cotton Genotypes

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 2094-2098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-Shu HAO ◽  
Cun-Cang JIANG ◽  
Xiao-Li WANG ◽  
Ying XIA ◽  
Fang CHEN
2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1657-1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liaqat Ali ◽  
Rahmatullah ◽  
M. Aamer Maqsood ◽  
Shamsa Kanwal ◽  
M. Ashraf ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
Saidzhamol T. Saidov ◽  
Viktor A. Dragavtsev ◽  
Asliddin T. Sadikov

This article presents the results of determining the attracting ability of the whole box and the degree of its differences depending on the genotypes, as well as its prospects for solving practical problems of selection of medium-fiber cotton. Consequently, among the genotypes studied by us, a significant amount of the attractive ability of a single box, the value of attraction and the mass of raw cotton per box differed in 10 combinations, which are economically the most productive.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 17-20
Author(s):  
Asliddin T. Sadikov

Some economically valuable traits of upland cotton genotypes are being considered in comparison with standard cultivar “Hisor”. Based on the results, it was established that the yield of raw cotton for all studied genotypes is 66.4-100.1 g/plant. In a comparative analysis of highly productive genotypes, 3 genotypes were distinguished – ALC-86/6 x Sorbon, DP-4025 x Dusti-IZ, NAD-53 x Sorbon, varying from 95.0 to 100.1 g/plant, exceeding the standard cultivar “Hisor” (40,8 g/plant) by 54,2-59,3 g/plant.


2002 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Costa ◽  
Lianne M. Dwyer ◽  
Xiaomin Zhou ◽  
Pierre Dutilleul ◽  
Chantal Hamel ◽  
...  

Crop Science ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 782-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph O. Moffett ◽  
Lee S. Stith ◽  
Chris C. Burkhardt ◽  
Charles W. Shipman
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document