Perception of Speaker-Specific Phonetic Detail

Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Wilson ◽  
Lisa Davidson ◽  
Sean Martin

2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 1376-1383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher T. Fennell ◽  
Sandra R. Waxman

2020 ◽  
pp. 136700692094718
Author(s):  
Sam Kirkham ◽  
Kathleen M. McCarthy

Aims and objectives: In this study, we consider the acquisition of allophonic contrast and phonetic detail in lateral consonants by second-generation Sylheti-English bilingual children in London, UK. Design/methodology/approach: Acoustic analysis was conducted on productions of /l/ by Sylheti bilingual children, Sylheti monolingual adults and English monolingual children. Data and analysis: Tokens of /l/ were elicited across initial, medial and final word positions from 14 bilingual Sylheti-English children, 10 monolingual English children, and 4 monolingual Sylheti adults. Acoustic measurements of F2–F1 were analysed using Bayesian linear mixed-effects modelling. Findings and conclusions: Our results show that bilingual children produce monolingual-like positional patterns in Sylheti, with very clear laterals in all positions. In contrast, bilinguals produce monolingual-like positional allophony in English, but they differ in phonetic detail, with bilinguals producing much clearer laterals than monolingual children across all positions. Originality: This study is the first to examine the development of allophonic contrast and phonetic detail in both of a bilingual’s languages in a contact scenario. This provides new insights into how contact varieties adopt aspects of structure and detail from each language. We also report valuable data from Sylheti-English bilinguals, who are an understudied community. Significance/limitations: Our study highlights the value of considering structural and detailed aspects of cross-linguistic sound systems, whereby one aspect may show monolingual-like patterns and another aspect may show distinctive patterns. We propose that the results in this study represent the development of a new sound system out of language contact, with second-generation bilingual children producing a hybrid system that combines influences from both heritage and host languages.


1983 ◽  
Vol 73 (S1) ◽  
pp. S4-S4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignatius G. Mattingly ◽  
Michael Studdert‐Kennedy ◽  
Harriet Magen

Phonology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Flemming

It is often assumed that there is a sharp division between phonetic and phonological processes, but the two are often strikingly similar, as in the case of phonetic consonant–vowel coarticulation and phonological assimilation between consonants and vowels. Parallels of this kind are best accounted for if both types of phenomena are analysed within a unified framework, so similarities result from the fact that both phonetic and phonological processes are subject to the same constraints. A unified model of phonetics and phonology is developed and exemplified through the analysis of parallel phonetic and phonological assimilation processes. The model operates in terms of scalar phonetic representations to accommodate phonetic detail, but categorical phenomena can still be derived from the interaction of speech production constraints with constraints that motivate the formation of distinct categories of sounds for the purposes of linguistic contrast.


2013 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 362-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine S. White ◽  
Eiling Yee ◽  
Sheila E. Blumstein ◽  
James L. Morgan
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Tomaschek ◽  
Benjamin V. Tucker ◽  
Michael Ramscar ◽  
R. H. Baayen

More and more studies find differences in fine phonetic detail related to the morphological function of words and segments. In the present study, we investigated to what extent these differences arise due to anticipatory coarticulation of inflectional exponents and the amount of long-term practice with individual verbs such as American English "clean", "cleaned", "cleans", "cleaning". Kinematic studies of hand movements show that with greater practice, i.e. regular repetition of a sequence of gestures, upcoming gestures are stronger and smoother anticipated. Consequently, we hypothesized to find stronger anticipatory coarticulation of inflectional exponents during the articulation of the stem vowel in verbs for which speakers acquired a greater lexical proficiency, as their articulatory gestures were better practiced. We observed both, stronger anticipatory coarticulation towards the offset of the gesture and less coarticulation concomittant with more hyperarticulation towards the onset of the gesture. We link these results to findings that morphological function is reflected in fine phonetic detail, challenging traditional models of speech production, which assume a separation of lexical information and the phonetic detail.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document