Controversies in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: emergency inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopic approach.

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-278
Author(s):  
M Sánchez-Ramírez ◽  
M Retamar ◽  
J Reguera ◽  
M Infantes ◽  
B Marenco de la Cuadra ◽  
...  

Resumen La cirugía laparoscópica es aceptada como la primera línea de tratamiento para algunas afecciones quirúrgicas agudas muy frecuentes como la colecistitis aguda, la apendicitis aguda y la úlcera péptica perforada. En el caso de las hernias inguinales de urgencias, poco a poco se está implementando el abordaje laparoscópico porque además de las ventajas que el propio abordaje ofrece, es una herramienta muy útil en comparación al abordaje abierto, ya que puede evaluar la cavidad abdominal y la viabilidad del intestino incarcerado. Debemos ser cautos a la hora de realizar este abordaje puesto que es un procedimiento que requiere experiencia quirúrgica concreta independientemente de los planos quirúrgicos clásicos.

Open Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 497-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessia Ferrarese ◽  
Marco Bindi ◽  
Matteo Rivelli ◽  
Mario Solej ◽  
Stefano Enrico ◽  
...  

AbstractLaparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is a safe and effective technique. In this study we tested the hypothesis that self-gripping mesh used with the laparoscopic approach is comparable to polypropylene mesh in terms of perioperative complications, against a lower overall cost of the procedure.We carried out a prospective randomized trial comparing a group of 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with self-gripping mesh versus a group of 30 patients who received polypropylene mesh with fibrin glue fixation.There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to intraoperative variables, early or late intraoperative complications, chronic pain or recurrence.Self-gripping mesh in transabdominal hernia repair was found to be a valid alternative to polypropylene mesh in terms of complications, recurrence and postoperative pain. The cost analysis and comparability of outcomes support the preferential use of self-gripping mesh.


Author(s):  
Marcelo FURTADO ◽  
Christiano M. P. CLAUS ◽  
Leandro Totti CAVAZZOLA ◽  
Flavio MALCHER ◽  
Alexandre BAKONYI-NETO ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has been shown to be superior than open repairs with faster return to daily activities and decrease in the occurrence of chronic pain. However, higher direct costs and mandatory use of general anesthesia are arguments against their use. In addition, increased complexity of surgery resulting from an anatomy that is unusual to general surgeons prevents the widespread adoption of laparoscopic approach. Aim: To propose a technical systematization for transabdominal laparoscopic repair (TAPP) of inguinal hernias based on anatomical concepts. Method: To offer a systematization of TAPP repair based on well defined anatomic landmarks, describing the concept of “inverted Y”, identification of five triangles and three zones of dissection, to achieve the “critical view of safety” for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Results: Since this standardization was developed five years ago, many surgeons were trained following these precepts. Reproducibility is high, as far as, it´s rate of adoption among surgeons. Conclusion: The concept of the “inverted Y”, “Five triangles” and the dissection based in “Three Zones” establish an effective and reproducible standardization of the TAPP technique.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Hipólito ◽  
Vicente Vieira ◽  
Virginia Antunes ◽  
Petra Alves ◽  
Adriana Rodrigues ◽  
...  

Background: Inguinal hernia is one of the most common conditions presented for surgical repair in children and laparoscopic approaches are increasingly performed. Previous studies have shown safety and efficacy in the use of supraglottic devices (SGD) as an alternative to tracheal intubation, which fits particularly well with outpatient anesthesia. Methodology: we conduct a retrospective observational study, collecting data from the electronic anesthetic form, from all patients aged 0 to 17 y who underwent ambulatory laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing between February 2015 and August 2019, if I-gelTM was used to airway management. Results: We found 230 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 5.2 y old, mean weight 20.1 kg. All patients were ASA I (n=203) or ASA II (n=27). The mean surgery duration was 38 minutes. We found 4 respiratory adverse events, three bronchospasms, and one laryngospasm, managed in the operating room. Ninety percent of the surgeries were performed without neuromuscular blockade. Conclusion: I-gelTM was a safe, effective, and convenient alternative to airway management to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the ambulatory setting. According to available literature, our practice did not represent an increased risk for the studied respiratory events. SGD obviates the need for neuromuscular blockade. Key words: I-gel; Supraglottic devices; Laparoscopy; Inguinal hernia repair; Pediatrics; Anesthesia, ambulatory Citation: Hipólito C, Vieira V, Antunes V, Alves P, Rodrigues A, Santos MJ. Airway management with I-gelTM for ambulatory laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children; a retrospective review of 230 cases. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2020;24(5): Received: 18 February 2020, Reviewed: 5 August, 6 September 2020, Accepted: 11 September 2020


2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 695-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOS C. VAN DEN BERG ◽  
PETER M. N. Y. H. GO ◽  
JOHANNIS C. DE VALOIS ◽  
GERD ROSENBUSCH

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazem AbdelSalam Mohamed ◽  
Karim Fahmy ◽  
Mohammad Ahmad Abd-erRazik ◽  
Shaimaa Atef Ismaeil Awwad Elkomy

Abstract Background The fundamental mechanism of abdominal wall hernia formation is the loss of structural integrity at the musculotendinous layer. The exact cause of inguinal hernia is still unknown but the factors contributing in its occurrence include; preformed congenital sac, chronic passive rise in the intra-abdominal pressure and weak abdominal wall. Aim of the Work To assess intra-operative difficulties of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using two different meshes: The conventional polyproline mesh and the three-dimensional (3D) mesh, as regard the operative time. And early post-operative complications including post-operative seroma, early postoperative pain, chronic pain and limitation of function. Patients and Methods In our study 30 patients were recruited according to our preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were divided randomly into two groups, a group in which the 3D mesh was used and a group in which the polypropylene mesh was used. The study was conducted in Ain Shams University hospitals for 6 months, in which patients where followed up from 3 to 6 months and compared in terms of intraoperative time, post-operative pain after one week, restriction of physical activity, seroma formation and presence of chronic pain. Results In our study the mean application time (minutes) in 3D group was found to be 7.07 ± 2.66 while in PP group it was found to be 12.53±3.66 with highly statistically significant difference between them at p < 0.001. We believe that this difference in fixation time in our present study is attributed to easy insertion through the port, easy intraoperative handling, and easy unfolding of 3D mesh. Conclusion The use of three-dimensional mesh (3D mesh) for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is a safe and viable option. It offers many advantages in terms of less fixation time, shorter hospital stays, early recovery with a better movement limitation score. Whereas chronic pain was found to be similar in both groups. Further, elimination of tacks for fixation and shorter hospital stay may reduce the cost of 3D mesh. Longer-term studies are recommended with a larger sample size and follow up duration for better assessment of chronic pain, also for following up on recurrence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document