scholarly journals Polypropylene “in vivo” Implantation in Inguinal Hernia Repair - Adverse Reactions

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (12) ◽  
pp. 4507-4513

Polypropylene mesh is the preferred biomaterial used in iguinal hernia repair due to its flexibility, strength, rapid integration by surrounding tissues and resistance to infection. Despite being rare, adverse reaction to polypropylene mesh “in vivo” implantation are still a reality in clinical practice. Infections of an implanted mesh are extremely rare, with an incidence lower than 0,1% in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, respectively 1,5% in the open approach. However, when this complication occurs, managing it can be extremely difficult. This paper presents the case study of a 41-year-old male patient operated for right inguinal hernia, using a polypropylene mesh implanted laparososcopically. As a delayed postoperative complication, he developed mesh infection, which could not be treated with conservative measures. Definitive treatment consisted in surgical excision of the mesh and one titanium clip, using a hybrid technique, which combined the laparoscopic approach and open surgery. The postoperative course was favourable, with resolution of the symptoms. No recurrent abscess or hernia were noted during 18 months follow-up. In conclusion, removal of the mesh using the hybrid approach, can be a solution for polypropylene mesh infection. Keywords: polypropylene mesh infection, hernia repair, mesh excision, hybrid approach.

Hernia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Feliu ◽  
R. Clavería ◽  
P. Besora ◽  
J. Camps ◽  
E. Fernández-Sallent ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 201 (6) ◽  
pp. 834-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asım Cingi ◽  
Manuk N. Manukyan ◽  
Bahadır M. Güllüoḡlu ◽  
Afşar Barlas ◽  
Cumhur Yeḡen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 77 (9) ◽  
pp. 2303-2310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi SUZUKI ◽  
Nobuki ICHIKAWA ◽  
Sayuri KASHIWAKURA ◽  
Tomohiro ISHIKAWA ◽  
Takeshi TSUJI ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-115
Author(s):  
Hosni Mubarak Khan ◽  
◽  
Tirumal Rao Patwari

Objective. This is a prospective study of 50 cases of inguinal hernias which were treated through open inguinal hernia repair techniques. The study was conducted with the objective of comparing the effectiveness of these procedures and complications. Materials and Methods. A number of 50 cases of inguinal hernias admitted to Dr. BR Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital were selected on the basis of the non-probability (purposive) sampling method. All the patients with direct and indirect uncomplicated hernias treated by means of an open approach were included. After the preoperative preparation, they were randomly chosen either for Desarda’s or Modified Bassini’s repair techniques. Results. In the postoperative period, moderate pain was experienced by 19 patients included in the Desarda group and 17 patients included in the Modified Bassini’s repair group on day 1. The postoperative wound infection developed in 2 cases of Desarda and 3 cases of Modified Bassini’s, erythema was observed in 2 cases of Desarda and 3 cases of Modified Bassini’s, 3 cases reported the occurrence of seroma in the Desarda group and 4 cases of seroma were recorded in the Modified Bassini’s group. Conclusions. The patients who underwent Desarda repair complained of a higher intensity of pain, which could probably be attributed to the extensive dissection involved. The duration of Desarda repair was longer due to the learning curve of the surgeons in our hospital. The return to normal gait and normal activities was significantly lower in the Desarda group. The duration of hospital stays and the postoperative complications was not significantly different in the two groups. There were no recurrences in either of the groups until the current study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document