scholarly journals Changes in picture recognition memory over time using an exclusion set paradigm

1975 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 433-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Elizabeth Bird
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Picture Recognition ◽  
Over Time

Nature of the Representation for Picture-Recognition Memory

1979 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 619-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Franken ◽  
G. L. Rowland
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Picture Recognition ◽  
Picture Memory ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Categorization Model

When distracting pictures are randomly selected from the same pool of pictures as the target pictures, performance with large numbers of pictures (1,000) is much poorer than has previously been reported. Further, performance drops quite substantially after 1 wk., a finding that differs from the conclusion that picture memory is relatively stable over time. Under conditions where the distractors were selected to reduce similarity between targets and distracting pictures, performance approximated levels previously reported in the literature. The results of the experiments seem to demand some type of categorization model of picture-recognition memory.

Picture Recognition Memory: A Review of Research and Theory

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Howard Levie ◽  
Susan N. Hathaway
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Picture Recognition

Organizational factors in picture recognition memory

1978 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 441-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.E. Franken ◽  
G.L. Rowland
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Organizational Factors ◽  
Picture Recognition

Picture-Recognition Memory as a Function of Picture Organization and Age

1977 ◽  
Vol 44 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1151-1154 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Franken
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Picture Recognition ◽  
Good Figure

The study was designed to determine whether the failure of previous studies to find a difference between the performance of children and adults in picture-recognition tasks might be due to the number, the selective content and the organization of the pictures used in certain studies of children. The results indicated that irrespective of age, subjects do much better on pictures that possess good figure-ground quality and further that when factors such as number, content and organization are controlled, there are effects due to age.

Picture Recognition Memory in Children: Effects of Homogeneous versus Heterogeneous Classes of Pictures

1983 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 749-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Franken ◽  
Diane C. Diamond
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Recognition Task ◽  
Picture Recognition ◽  
Developmental Trends ◽  
Heterogeneous Classes ◽  
Heterogeneous Class

This study shows that, when homogeneous classes of pictures are used in a picture-recognition task, developmental trends do emerge whereas when a heterogeneous class of pictures is used such developmental trends are not found. These results are consistent with the view that as children get older (3–4 yr., 6–7 yr., 9–10 yr., adolescents, adults) they get better at organizing material that is more difficult to differentiate or remember.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document