scholarly journals Stimulus-response durations in paired-associates learning

1966 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfred A. Baumeister ◽  
William F. Hawkins

1976 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 643-650
Author(s):  
Roy B. Weinstock

The major purpose of this investigation was to test the association-activation hypothesis in paired-associate learning through the administration of separate stimulus and stimulus-response recognition tests following moderate acquisition of a paired-associate list. Of incerest also were stimulus configuration and meaningfulness of number of stimuli. Results were clearly nonsupportive of the activation hypothesis since a significantly above-chance proportion of stimulus-response pairs was correctly recognized directly after nonrecognition of the respective stimulus-only members of the pairs occurred. Further, stimulus configuration was not statistically reliable, thereby offering presumptive evidence that visual coding of information is ineffective in a long-term memory task. Stimuli high in meaningfulness were more effective than those low in meaningfulness both during list-acquisition and in the stimulus-recognition test phase.





2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 79-90
Author(s):  
Courtney G. Scott ◽  
Trina M. Becker ◽  
Kenneth O. Simpson

The use of computer monitors to provide technology-based written feedback during clinical sessions, referred to as “bug-in-the-eye” (BITi) feedback, recently emerged in the literature with preliminary evidence to support its effectiveness (Carmel, Villatte, Rosenthal, Chalker & Comtois, 2015; Weck et al., 2016). This investigation employed a single-subject, sequential A-B design with two participants to observe the effects of implementing BITi feedback using a smartwatch on the clinical behavior of student clinicians (SCs). Baseline and treatment data on the stimulus-response-consequence (S-R-C) contingency completion rates of SCs were collected using 10 minute segments of recorded therapy sessions. All participants were students enrolled in a clinical practicum experience in a communication disorders and sciences (CDS) program. A celeration line, descriptive statistics, and stability band were used to analyze the data by slope, trend, and variability. Results demonstrated a significant correlative relationship between BITi feedback with a smartwatch and an increase in positive clinical behaviors. Based on qualitative interviews and exit rating scales, SCs reported BITi feedback was noninvasive and minimally distracting. Preliminary evidence suggests BITi feedback with a smartwatch may be an effective tool for providing real-time clinical feedback.



1998 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 1078-1078
Author(s):  
Todd D. Nelson




2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akio Nishimura ◽  
Chikashi Michimata


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario O. de Jonge ◽  
Diane Pecher ◽  
Jan W. Van Strien ◽  
Huib Tabbers ◽  
Rene Zeelenberg


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motonori Yamaguchi ◽  
Robert W. Proctor
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document