scholarly journals A role for backward transitional probabilities in word segmentation?

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 1299-1305 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. PERRUCHET ◽  
S. DESAULTY
Author(s):  
Louise Goyet ◽  
Séverine Millotte ◽  
Anne Christophe ◽  
Thierry Nazzi

The present chapter focuses on fluent speech segmentation abilities in early language development. We first review studies exploring the early use of major prosodic boundary cues which allow infants to cut full utterances into smaller-sized sequences like clauses or phrases. We then summarize studies showing that word segmentation abilities emerge around 8 months, and rely on infants’ processing of various bottom-up word boundary cues and top-down known word recognition cues. Given that most of these cues are specific to the language infants are acquiring, we emphasize how the development of these abilities varies cross-linguistically, and explore their developmental origin. In particular, we focus on two cues that might allow bootstrapping of these abilities: transitional probabilities and rhythmic units.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1169-1201
Author(s):  
Andrew CAINES ◽  
Emma ALTMANN-RICHER ◽  
Paula BUTTERY

AbstractWe select three word segmentation models with psycholinguistic foundations – transitional probabilities, the diphone-based segmenter, and PUDDLE – which track phoneme co-occurrence and positional frequencies in input strings, and in the case of PUDDLE build lexical and diphone inventories. The models are evaluated on caregiver utterances in 132 CHILDES corpora representing 28 languages and 11.9 m words. PUDDLE shows the best performance overall, albeit with wide cross-linguistic variation. We explore the reasons for this variation, fitting regression models to performance scores with linguistic properties which capture lexico-phonological characteristics of the input: word length, utterance length, diversity in the lexicon, the frequency of one-word utterances, the regularity of phoneme patterns at word boundaries, and the distribution of diphones in each language. These properties together explain four-tenths of the observed variation in segmentation performance, a strong outcome and a solid foundation for studying further variables which make the segmentation task difficult.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris Broedelet ◽  
Paul Boersma ◽  
Judith Rispens

Since Saffran, Aslin and Newport (1996) showed that infants were sensitive to transitional probabilities between syllables after being exposed to a few minutes of fluent speech, there has been ample research on statistical learning. Word segmentation studies usually test learning by making use of “offline methods” such as forced-choice tasks. However, cognitive factors besides statistical learning possibly influence performance on those tasks. The goal of the present study was to improve a method for measuring word segmentation online. Click sounds were added to the speech stream, both between words and within words. Stronger expectations for the next syllable within words as opposed to between words were expected to result in slower detection of clicks within words, revealing sensitivity to word boundaries. Unexpectedly, we did not find evidence for learning in multiple groups of adults and child participants. We discuss possible methodological factors that could have influenced our results.


Author(s):  
Jyotsna Vaid ◽  
Hsin-Chin Chen ◽  
Francisco E. Martinez ◽  
Chaitra Rao
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document