scholarly journals Metamemory for pictures of naturalistic scenes: Assessment of accuracy and cue utilization

Author(s):  
Monika Undorf ◽  
Arndt Bröder

AbstractMemory for naturalistic pictures is exceptionally good. However, little is known about people’s ability to monitor the memorability of naturalistic pictures. We report the first systematic investigation into the accuracy and basis of metamemory in this domain. People studied pictures of naturalistic scenes, predicted their chances of recognizing each picture at a later test (judgment of learning, JOL), and completed a recognition memory test. Across three experiments, JOLs revealed substantial accuracy. This was due to people basing their JOLs on multiple cues, most of which predicted recognition memory. Identified cues include intrinsic picture attributes (e.g., peacefulness of scenes; scenes with or without persons) and extrinsic aspects of the study situation (e.g., presentation frequency; semantic distinctiveness of scenes with respect to the context). This work provides a better understanding of metamemory for pictures and it demonstrates close parallels between metamemory for naturalistic scenes and verbal materials.

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1391-1399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Smirni ◽  
Pietro Smirni ◽  
Giovanni Di Martino ◽  
Lisa Cipolotti ◽  
Massimiliano Oliveri ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 86 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1320-1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron C. Malina ◽  
Dana A. Bowers ◽  
Scott R. Millis ◽  
Sara Uekert

The Recognition Memory Test is frequently used to assess memory; however, one of the commonly cited limitations is a lack of data on reliability. The current study was undertaken to estimate the internal consistency reliability of the test with a sample of 72 persons with traumatic brain injury. Acceptable estimates of internal consistency for both subtests were obtained.


Assessment ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant L. Iverson ◽  
Michael D. Franzen

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the efficacy of using the Recognition Memory Test (RMT), Digit Span subtest (WAIS-R), and Knox Cube Test as markers for malingered memory deficits. Participants were 100 subjects from three general populations: university students, federal inmates, and patients with head injuries. Twenty students, 20 inmates, and 20 patients with head injuries resulting in memory impairment were instructed to try their best on the assessment procedures. The remaining 20 students and 20 inmates were instructed to malinger memory impairment on the procedures. The experimental-malingerers (i.e., students and inmates) performed more poorly than the patients with head injuries on nearly every score derived from the three tests. Discriminant function analyses using the age-corrected Digit Span scale score, the Knox Cube Test total score, and the RMT raw scores for words and faces as predictors of group membership resulted in an overall 98% correct classification rate and 100% correct on cross-validation. Simultaneously applying two empirically-derived RMT cutoff scores resulted in an overall correct classification rate of 100%. The extraordinarily high classification rates in this study were likely influenced by the experimental design and procedures.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Feil ◽  
Jose Mestre ◽  
Leon Hsu ◽  
Charles Henderson ◽  
Laura McCullough

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document