Meta-analysis of the effects of pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy to prevent or treat incontinence

Author(s):  
Shiwen ZHANG ◽  
◽  
Meiling HUANG ◽  
Jincao ZHI ◽  
Fei PEI ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Ragil Aidil Fitriasari Addini ◽  
◽  
Eti Poncorini Pamungkasari ◽  
Bhisma Murti ◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Esther García-Sánchez ◽  
Vicente Ávila-Gandía ◽  
Javier López-Román ◽  
Alejandro Martínez-Rodríguez ◽  
Jacobo Á. Rubio-Arias

Pelvic floor muscle training is commonly used for urine loss. However, research studies have not determined which training load is the most effective for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Moreover, none of the previous reviews or studies have described the total effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with an objective test such as the pad test. The objectives were to analyze the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training in women with SUI and to determine which training load produces the greatest adaptations for decreasing urine loss. The search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane), for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of PFMT. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: participants were women; were older than 18; had SUI; were treated with PFMT; and the assessments of the effects were measured with a pad test. Finally, 10 articles (293 women) analyzed the pad test in women with SUI who performed PFMT. The meta-analysis showed that PFMT, independent of the protocol used in the study, resulted in decreased urine loss in women suffering from SUI. However, for large effects, the program should last 6–12 weeks, with >3 sessions/week and a length of session <45 min.


2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 226-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heejung Choi ◽  
Mary H. Palmer ◽  
Jeongok Park

2020 ◽  
pp. 019394592096077
Author(s):  
Ji Lu ◽  
Hong Zhang ◽  
Li Liu ◽  
Wei Jin ◽  
Jie Gao ◽  
...  

This study was to evaluate the effect of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on urinary incontinence (UI) in prenatal and postnatal women. The relevant literatures were searched from Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science until January 20, 2020. Meta-analysis was performed with STATA 15.1 and the Begg’s test was used for the publication bias. Results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that the rate of UI in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group [relative risk (RR): 0.712, 95%confidence intervals (CI): 0.622–0.816, P<0.001); the strength of pelvic floor muscle in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group [weighted mean difference (WMD): 8.448, 95%CI: 2.300–14.595, P=0.007); and the urine leakage measured by the urinal pad in the intervention group was less than that in the control group (WMD: -1.699, 95%CI:-2.428–-0.970, P<0.001). PFMT showed a better effect for UI than the routine nursing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1865-1879
Author(s):  
Giovana Vesentini ◽  
Joanna Prior ◽  
Paulo H. Ferreira ◽  
Paul W. Hodges ◽  
Marilza Rudge ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document