A Study of New Evolutionary Approach for Multiobjective Optimization

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 987-992
Author(s):  
Efrén Mezura-Montes ◽  
Edgar A. Portilla-Flores ◽  
Carlos A. Coello Coello ◽  
Jaime Alvarez-Gallegos ◽  
Carlos A. Cruz-Villar

2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 669-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandro Dos S. Coelho ◽  
Viviana C. Mariani ◽  
Fabio A. Guerra ◽  
Mauricio V. F. da Luz ◽  
Jean V. Leite

Author(s):  
Zeneng She ◽  
Wenjian Luo ◽  
Yatong Chang ◽  
Xin Lin ◽  
Ying Tan

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Del Giudice

Abstract The argument against innatism at the heart of Cognitive Gadgets is provocative but premature, and is vitiated by dichotomous thinking, interpretive double standards, and evidence cherry-picking. I illustrate my criticism by addressing the heritability of imitation and mindreading, the relevance of twin studies, and the meaning of cross-cultural differences in theory of mind development. Reaching an integrative understanding of genetic inheritance, plasticity, and learning is a formidable task that demands a more nuanced evolutionary approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document