scholarly journals Factors Impacting Conversations with Friends and Family about Living Kidney Donation

The Physician ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ahmed Ahmed ◽  
Anna Winterbottom ◽  
John Stoves ◽  
Shenaz Ahmed ◽  
Sunil Daga

Introduction  Living donor kidney transplantation is the optimal modality of renal replacement therapy for advanced kidney disease. It is associated with superior recipient and graft survival, a better quality of life and self-reported health status compared to dialysis. Living kidney donation occurs less frequently in members of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities in Western countries. This scoping review explores the factors affecting the ability of patients (and health professionals) to initiate conversations about living kidney donation with family and friends, with a focus on BAME population groups. Methods  208 published articles were identified from online databases using keywords: ‘barriers’, ‘decision making’, ‘living donor’, and ‘kidney transplantation. Studies limited to donors or involving paediatric recipients were excluded, Results There were 25 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 21 studies included BAME communities. Participants of South Asian ethnicity were underrepresented. Key themes were; 1) lack of knowledge 2) risk perception 3) fear of financial burden on donors 4) guilt 5) religious and cultural influences and 6) mistrust of the medical establishment. There were noticeable differences in ethnicity, in the level of knowledge, risk perception and fear of financial burden. Religious/cultural reservations and medical mistrust were only reported in people from BAME populations. Two studies explored health professionals’ views. Discussion This literature review has identified different barriers to the pursuit of living kidney donation, some of which are linked to ethnicity. This study informs the development of a patient decision aid to support people to have conversations with potential donors, with a particular focus on South Asian groups, the second largest ethnic group in the UK.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyungok Min ◽  
Tai Yeon Koo ◽  
Young Hui Hwang ◽  
Jaeseok Yang

Abstract Since the waiting time for deceased donor kidney transplantation continues to increase, living donor kidney transplantation is an important treatment for end stage kidney disease patients. Barriers to living kidney donation have been rarely investigated despite a growing interest in the utilization of living donor transplantation and the satisfaction of donor safety. Here, we retrospectively analyzed 1,658 potential donors and 1,273 potential recipients who visited the Seoul National University Hospital for living kidney transplantation between 2010 and 2017 to study the causes of donation failure. Among 1,658 potential donors, 902 (54.4%) failed to donate kidneys. The average number of potential donors that received work-up was 1.30 ± 0.66 per recipient. Among living donor kidney transplant patients, 75.1% received kidneys after work-up of the first donor and 24.9% needed work-up of two or more donors. Donor-related factors (49.2%) were the most common causes of donation failure, followed by immunologic or size mismatches between donors and recipients (25.4%) and recipient-related factors (16.2%). Interestingly, withdrawal of donation will along with refusal by recipients or family were the commonest causes, suggesting the importance of non-biomedical aspects. The elucidation of the barriers to living kidney donation could ensure more efficient and safer living kidney donation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 679-692
Author(s):  
Jenn Anderson ◽  
Rebecca K. Britt ◽  
Brian C. Britt ◽  
Shana Harming ◽  
Nancy Fahrenwald

Living kidney donation and transplant (LKDT) offers a path of hope for patients on indefinite dialysis treatment. However, identification of a living donor can be challenging; initiating these conversations is difficult. Our study analyzes memorable conversations about LKDT that occurred in response to an LKDT campaign targeted to Native Americans. Our analysis of n = 28 memorable conversations revealed that the campaign prompted conversations and increased communication efficacy about LKDT. Based on these findings, we suggest that campaign designers utilize narratives within campaigns to model communication self-efficacy and then analyze the content of postcampaign conversations as an indicator of campaign effectiveness.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-165
Author(s):  
Lisa Burnapp ◽  
Kristof Van Assche ◽  
Annette Lennerling ◽  
Dorthe Slaats ◽  
David Van Dellen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the preferred treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease and unspecified living kidney donation is morally justified. Despite the excellent outcomes of LDKT, unspecified kidney donation (UKD) is limited to a minority of European countries due to legal constraints and moral objections. Consequently, there are significant variations in practice and approach between countries and the contribution of UKD is undervalued. Where UKD is accepted as routine, an increasing number of patients in the kidney exchange programme are successfully transplanted when a ‘chain’ of transplants is triggered by a single unspecified donor. By expanding the shared living donor pool, the benefit of LDKT is extended to patients who do not have their own living donor because a recipient on the national transplant list always completes the chain. Is there a moral imperative to increase the scope of UKD and how could this be achieved? Methods An examination of the literature and individual country practices was performed to identify the limitations on UKD in Europe and recommend strategies to increase transplant opportunities. Results Primary limitations to UKD, key players and their roles and responsibilities were identified. Conclusions Raising awareness to encourage the public to volunteer to donate is appropriate and desirable to increase UKD. Recommendations are made to provide a framework for increasing awareness and engagement in UKD. The public, healthcare professionals, policy makers and society and religious leaders have a role to play in creating an environment for change.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 204-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn B. Larson ◽  
Jennifer F. Wiseman ◽  
David M. Vock ◽  
Danielle M. Berglund ◽  
Ashley M. Roman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 1918-1923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit X. Garg

The best treatment option for many patients with kidney failure is a kidney transplant from a living donor. Countries that successfully increase their rate of living kidney donation will decrease their reliance on dialysis, the most expensive and high-risk form of kidney replacement therapy. Outlined here are some barriers that prevent some patients from pursuing living kidney donation and current knowledge on some potential solutions to these barriers. Also described are strategies to promote living kidney donation in a defensible system of practice. Safely increasing the rate of living kidney donation will require better programs and policies to improve the experiences of living donors and their recipients, to safeguard the practice for years to come.


2007 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio R??os ◽  
Pablo Ram??rez ◽  
Mar??a del Mar Rodr??guez ◽  
Lewa Mart??nez ◽  
Mariano Jeime Montoya ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document