scholarly journals The Hanshaw Helm-Stevens Rapid Prototype Instructional Design Model: Examining the Dimensions of Structure and Dialogue within the Framework of Higher Education

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-46
Author(s):  
Roxanne Helm-Stevens ◽  
George Hanshaw ◽  
Joseph Kim
Author(s):  
Maria Fragkaki ◽  
Stylianos Mystakidis ◽  
Ioannis Hatzilygeroudis ◽  
Konstantinos Kovas ◽  
Zuzana Palkova ◽  
...  

Respuestas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-75
Author(s):  
Doris Patricia Mora Marín ◽  
Ilber Darío Saza Garzón ◽  
Fernando Santamaría

This article is a part of the research process for choosing an instructional design model within an educational institution of Higher Education in Colombia. It analyzes and reflects on different models of instructional design and before that sustains a definition and historical evolution of the different systems that have evolved the term of instructional design. With all the data and information required and on a basis consistent with the mission and vision of the institution Minute University Corporation of God, response and choice is given to a coherent model.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert de Leeuw ◽  
Fedde Scheele ◽  
Kieran Walsh ◽  
Michiel Westerman

BACKGROUND Digital education tools (e-learning, technology-enhanced learning) can be defined as any educational intervention that is electronically mediated. Decveloping and applying such tools and interventions for postgraduate medical professionals who work and learn after graduation can be called postgraduate medical digital education (PGMDE), which is increasingly being used and evaluated. However, evaluation has focused mainly on reaching the learning goals and little on the design. Design models for digital education (instructional design models) help educators create a digital education curriculum, but none have been aimed at PGMDE. Studies show the need for efficient, motivating, useful, and satisfactory digital education. OBJECTIVE Our objective was (1) to create an empirical instructional design model for PGMDE founded in evidence and theory, with postgraduate medical professionals who work and learn after graduation as the target audience, and (2) to compare our model with existing models used to evaluate and create PGMDE. METHODS Previously we performed an integrative literature review, focus group discussions, and a Delphi procedure to determine which building blocks for such a model would be relevant according to experts and users. This resulted in 37 relevant items. We then used those 37 items and arranged them into chronological steps. After we created the initial 9-step plan, we compared these steps with other models reported in the literature. RESULTS The final 9 steps were (1) describe who, why, what, (2) select educational strategies, (3) translate to the real world, (4) choose the technology, (5) complete the team, (6) plan the budget, (7) plan the timing and timeline, (8) implement the project, and (9) evaluate continuously. On comparing this 9-step model with other models, we found that no other was as complete, nor were any of the other models aimed at PGMDE. CONCLUSIONS Our 9-step model is the first, to our knowledge, to be based on evidence and theory building blocks aimed at PGMDE. We have described a complete set of evidence-based steps, expanding a 3-domain model (motivate, learn, and apply) to an instructional design model that can help every educator in creating efficient, motivating, useful, and satisfactory PGMDE. Although certain steps are more robust and have a deeper theoretical background in current research (such as education), others (such as budget) have been barely touched upon and should be investigated more thoroughly in order that proper guidelines may also be provided for them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document