scholarly journals OPTIMAL CONTROL OF PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTIONS OF STOCHASTIC PROCESSES

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Annunziato ◽  
Alfio Borzì

A Fokker‐Planck framework for the formulation of an optimal control strategy of stochastic processes is presented. Within this strategy, the control objectives are defined based on the probability density functions of the stochastic processes. The optimal control is obtained as the minimizer of the objective under the constraint given by the Fokker‐Planck model. Representative stochastic processes are considered with different control laws and with the purpose of attaining a final target configuration or tracking a desired trajectory. In this latter case, a receding‐horizon algorithm over a sequence of time windows is implemented.

2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Yan ZHANG ◽  
Zhong-Hai MA ◽  
Xiao-Bin QIAN ◽  
Shao-Ming LI ◽  
Jia-Hong LANG

2021 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 110789
Author(s):  
Parthasakha Das ◽  
Samhita Das ◽  
Pritha Das ◽  
Fathalla A. Rihan ◽  
Muhammet Uzuntarla ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2307
Author(s):  
J. Javier Gorgoso-Varela ◽  
Rafael Alonso Ponce ◽  
Francisco Rodríguez-Puerta

The diameter distributions of trees in 50 temporary sample plots (TSPs) established in Pinus halepensis Mill. stands were recovered from LiDAR metrics by using six probability density functions (PDFs): the Weibull (2P and 3P), Johnson’s SB, beta, generalized beta and gamma-2P functions. The parameters were recovered from the first and the second moments of the distributions (mean and variance, respectively) by using parameter recovery models (PRM). Linear models were used to predict both moments from LiDAR data. In recovering the functions, the location parameters of the distributions were predetermined as the minimum diameter inventoried, and scale parameters were established as the maximum diameters predicted from LiDAR metrics. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) statistic (Dn), number of acceptances by the KS test, the Cramér von Misses (W2) statistic, bias and mean square error (MSE) were used to evaluate the goodness of fits. The fits for the six recovered functions were compared with the fits to all measured data from 58 TSPs (LiDAR metrics could only be extracted from 50 of the plots). In the fitting phase, the location parameters were fixed at a suitable value determined according to the forestry literature (0.75·dmin). The linear models used to recover the two moments of the distributions and the maximum diameters determined from LiDAR data were accurate, with R2 values of 0.750, 0.724 and 0.873 for dg, dmed and dmax. Reasonable results were obtained with all six recovered functions. The goodness-of-fit statistics indicated that the beta function was the most accurate, followed by the generalized beta function. The Weibull-3P function provided the poorest fits and the Weibull-2P and Johnson’s SB also yielded poor fits to the data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document