Study of Structural Phase Transition and Dielectric Behavior Of BiNaTiO 3 -SrTiO3 (BNT-ST) Solid Solution

Author(s):  
S. K. Sayyed ◽  
S. A. Acharya
2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (05) ◽  
pp. 613-620
Author(s):  
S. CHITRA ◽  
K. P. N. MURTHY ◽  
K. RAMACHANDRAN

The average cohesive energy of the GdMg solid solution for various composition from x=0.10 to 0.90 has been worked out by simulation at 300 K, using Monte Carlo (MC) technique and was found that at x=0.58 there is a structural phase transition. This is compared with the available experimental results and was discussed.


1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1019-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon A. T. Redfern ◽  
Anthony M. T. Bell ◽  
C. Michael B. Henderson ◽  
Paule Schofield

1997 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. F. Schofield ◽  
K. S. Knight ◽  
S. A. T. Redfern ◽  
G. Cressey

Rietveld analysis of neutron powder diffraction data on the sanmartinite (ZnWO4)-cuproscheelite (CuWO4) solid solution has enabled the comparison of microscopic and macroscopic order parameters associated with the P2/c–P\overline 1 structural phase transition. The macroscopic spontaneous strain, calculated from the lattice parameters, conforms well with a second-order Landau model. Furthermore, this is also true of the symmetry-related atomistic M—O order parameter and the quadratic elongation of the MO6 octahedra. It is clear that the Jahn–Teller effect, associated with the divalent Cu cation, is the driving force for the phase transition and the excess elongation evident in the M—O(2) bond giving rise to the non-symmetry predicted strain element e 22. The existence of a large region of order parameter saturation at the copper-rich end of the solid solution is also associated with the MO6 elongation and the breakdown of the homogeneous strain field of the zinc solute atoms.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (22) ◽  
pp. 25143-25149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dian Li ◽  
Xiong Wang ◽  
Chi-ming Kan ◽  
Daliang He ◽  
Zejun Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document