East Asian Social Survey (EASS), Cross-National Survey Data Sets: Culture and Globalization in East Asia, 2008

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Hwa Chang (TSCS) ◽  
Noriko Iwai (JGSS) ◽  
Lulu Li (CGSS) ◽  
Sang-Wook Kim (KGSS)
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriko Iwai (JGSS) ◽  
Lulu Li (CGSS) ◽  
Sang-Wook Kim (KGSS) ◽  
Ying-Hwa Chang (TSCS)

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriko Iwai (JGSS) ◽  
Lulu Li (CGSS) ◽  
Sang-Wook Kim (KGSS) ◽  
Ying-Hwa Chang (TSCS)

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Wook Kim (KGSS) ◽  
Ying-Hwa Chang (TSCS) ◽  
Noriko Iwai (JGSS) ◽  
Lulu Li (CGSS)

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Wook Kim (KGSS) ◽  
Ying-Hwa Chang (TSCS) ◽  
Noriko Iwai (JGSS) ◽  
Lulu Li (CGSS)

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Hwa Chang (TSCS) ◽  
Noriko Iwai (JGSS) ◽  
Lulu Li (CGSS) ◽  
Sang-Wook Kim (KGSS)

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-203
Author(s):  
Ming-Chang Tsai ◽  
Ying-Ting Wang

Abstract Adult children’s financial support for parents, which has been considered a primary representation of filial values in East Asian society, is not sufficient to understand contemporary familial reciprocation. To fully understand the detailed structure of intergenerational exchange in this region, this study proposes a new two-way typology to look at how parents both give and take with adult children. Using the 2006 East Asian Social Survey, the authors found a high frequency of financial exchange between generations, especially upward transfer, in South Korea, Taiwan, and China. Japan is a case more distant from the Confucian ideal type of family due to high prevalence of independence between parents and children regarding financial exchange. Cross-country differences are much remarked. The limited effects produced by gender and sibling orders in financial transfer show the decreasing influence of patriarchalism in East Asia.


Methodology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-207
Author(s):  
Piotr Jabkowski ◽  
Marta Kołczyńska

This article addresses the comparability of sampling and fieldwork with an analysis of methodological data describing 1,537 national surveys from five major comparative cross-national survey projects in Europe carried out in the period from 1981 to 2017. We describe the variation in the quality of the survey documentation, and in the survey methodologies themselves, focusing on survey procedures with respect to: 1) sampling frames, 2) types of survey samples and sampling designs, 3) within-household selection of target persons in address-based samples, 4) fieldwork execution and 5) fieldwork outcome rates. Our results show substantial differences in sample designs and fieldwork procedures across survey projects, as well as changes within projects over time. This variation invites caution when selecting data for analysis. We conclude with recommendations regarding the use of information about the survey process to select existing survey data for comparative analyses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document