Limitations of Correcting Spherical Aberration With Aspheric Intraocular Lenses

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 541-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holger H Dietze ◽  
Michael J Cox
2008 ◽  
Vol 145 (5) ◽  
pp. 827-833.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick F. Tzelikis ◽  
Leonardo Akaishi ◽  
Fernando C. Trindade ◽  
Joel E. Boteon

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Lasta ◽  
Kata Miháltz ◽  
Illés Kovács ◽  
Pia Veronika Vécsei-Marlovits

Purpose. To compare the effect of spherical aberration on optical quality in eyes with two different aspherical intraocular lenses. Methods. 120 eyes of 60 patients underwent phacoemulsification. In patients’ eyes, an aberration-free IOL (Aspira-aA; Human Optics) or an aberration-correcting aspherical IOL (Tecnis ZCB00; Abott Medical Optics) was randomly implanted. After surgery, contrast sensitivity and wavefront measurements as well as tilt and decentration measurements were performed. Results. Contrast sensitivity was significantly higher in eyes with Aspira lens under mesopic conditions with 12 cycles per degree (CPD) and under photopic conditions with 18 CPD (p=0.02). Wavefront measurements showed a higher total spherical aberration with a minimal pupil size of 4 mm in the Aspira group (0.05 ± 0.03) than in the Tecnis group (0.03 ± 0.02) (p=0.001). Strehl ratio was higher in eyes with Tecnis (0.28 ± 0.17) with a minimal pupil size larger than 5 mm than that with Aspira (0.16 ± 0.14) (p=0.04). In pupils with a minimum diameter of 4 mm spherical aberration had a significant effect on Strehl ratio, but not in pupils with a diameter less than 4 mm. Conclusions. Optical quality was better in eyes with the aberration-correcting Tecnis IOL when pupils were large. In contrast, this could not be shown in eyes with pupils under 4 mm or larger. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03224728.


1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Concepcion Gonzalez ◽  
Inmaculada Pascual ◽  
Angeles Bacete ◽  
Antonio Fimia

2014 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eloy A. Villegas ◽  
Encarna Alcón ◽  
Sandra Mirabet ◽  
Inés Yago ◽  
José María Marín ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miaomiao Qin ◽  
Min Ji ◽  
Tianqiu Zhou ◽  
Yurong Yuan ◽  
Jiawei Luo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To assess postoperative changes in angle alpha, and to evaluate the postoperative visual quality of patients with different angle alpha values after implantation of extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs).Methods: Seventy-nine eyes of 79 patients who had phacoemulsification with EDOF IOLs implantation were enrolled. A cut-off value of 0.3 mm, 0.4 mm, and 0.5 mm in preoperative angle alpha was chosen to divide eyes into groups. Distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities, modulation transfer function (MTF), and aberrations were recorded during a 6-month follow-up. A patient questionnaire was completed. Results: There were no significant differences in angle alpha postoperatively compared to preoperatively. No significant differences were found in visual acuity and MTF between all groups. With 5mm pupil diameter, there were significant differences of higher-order aberrations and spherical aberration in ocular aberration and internal aberration between angle alpha<0.4 mm and angle alpha≥ 0.4 mm. Additionally, significant differences of coma were also added in cut-off value of 0.5 mm. When the value of angle alpha is 0.4 mm or higher, there were significant differences in the score of halos and glare.Conclusions: Angle alpha did not affect visual acuity, but the value of 0.4 mm or higher in angle alpha affected the visual quality under scotopic conditions and occurrence of halos and glare. For patients with 0.4 mm or higher in angle alpha, the decision to implant a EDOF IOL should be carefully considered.


2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 327-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Ruiz-Alcocer ◽  
Caridad Pérez-Vives ◽  
David Madrid-Costa ◽  
Norberto López-Gil ◽  
Robert Montés-Micó

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document