Intraocular Pressure Fluctuations During Strabismus Operations and the Postoperative Period

1999 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moshe Snir ◽  
Ruth Axer-Siegel ◽  
J Chalimi ◽  
B Shalev ◽  
Yuval Yassur
Author(s):  
Vincent Libertiaux ◽  
William P. Seigfreid ◽  
Massimo A. Fazio ◽  
Juan F. Reynaud ◽  
Claude F. Burgoyne ◽  
...  

The optic nerve head (ONH) is the site of insult in glaucoma, the second leading cause of blindness worldwide. Intraocular pressure (IOP) is commonly regarded as a major factor in the onset and progression of the disease1 and lowering IOP is the only clinical treatment that has been shown to retard the onset and progression of glaucoma2. However, many patients continue to progress even at an epidemiologically-determined normal level of IOP3. This suggests that in addition to the mean value of IOP, IOP fluctuations could be a factor in glaucomatous pathophysiology. The importance of low frequency fluctuations of clinically-measured mean IOP remains controversial. These studies all rely on snapshot measurements of mean IOP at each time point, and those measurements are taken at relatively infrequent intervals (hourly at the most frequent, but usually monthly or longer). Recently however, there has been some interest in ocular pulse amplitude, or the fluctuation in IOP associated with the cardiac cycle, which can be measured by Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT). DCT provides continuous measurement of IOP, but only for a period of tens of seconds in which a patient can tolerate corneal contact without blinking or eye movement, which ironically are two of the most common sources of large high frequency IOP fluctuations according to our telemetric data collected from monkeys4 and previous human studies. In a recent report, continuous IOP telemetry was used in three nonhuman primates to characterize IOP dynamics at multiple time scales for multiple 24-hour periods5.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 923-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald M.P.C. de Crom ◽  
Carroll A.B. Webers ◽  
Marina A.W. van Kooten-Noordzij ◽  
Agnes C. Michiels ◽  
Jan S.A.G. Schouten ◽  
...  

Ophthalmology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 109 (7) ◽  
pp. 1367-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Realini ◽  
Laurie Barber ◽  
Diana Burton

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 497-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee A Polikoff ◽  
Anthony Taglienti ◽  
Raul A Chanis ◽  
Jerome C Ramos-Esteban ◽  
Nicholas Donas ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 489-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe A. Medeiros ◽  
Alexandre Pinheiro ◽  
Frederico C. Moura ◽  
Bruno C. Leal ◽  
Remo Susanna

2012 ◽  
Vol 227 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Klink ◽  
Stefanie Praetorius ◽  
Swetlana Leippi ◽  
Janine Klink ◽  
Franz J. Grehn

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco W Rodrigues ◽  
Camilla de MN Silva ◽  
Déborah C Modesto ◽  
Antônio WS de Oliveira ◽  
Rodrigo Egidio da Silva

Objective: To evaluate the intraocular pressure variation before and after phacoemulsification through pneumatic tonometry in addition to correlating it with the age, gender, and preoperative intraocular pressure of the patients evaluated. Methods: This is a cross-sectional observational study. Inclusion criteria were older than 18 years, deep anterior chamber visualized by the slit lamp and estimation of open angle using the Van Herick technique, intraocular pressure less than 21 mmHg, without surgical complications, and without any ocular disease. The intraocular pressure was measured by the pneumatic tonometer. The intraocular pressure assessment was performed at the last consultation before phacoemulsification surgery and 30 days after. Results: A sample of 182 eyes was used. The mean age was 68.41 ± 10.84 years. Of the patient, 65% were females and 35% were males. The mean intraocular pressure in the preoperative period was 16.0 mmHg (±3.3 mmHg) and the mean intraocular pressure in the postoperative period was 13.44 mmHg (±3.31 mmHg). There was no correlation between intraocular pressure variations in both eyes (age-matched open angle) and age. There was a statistically significant correlation between the preoperative intraocular pressure value and the intraocular pressure changes in the postoperative period. In the comparison of the intraocular pressure variation between the genders, the female gender presented a statistically significant negative variation. Conclusion: We conclude that the cataract surgery is related to the reduction of intraocular pressure in the postoperative period and this reduction is more influenced by its preoperative value. Other studies of high epidemiological impact are needed, which may corroborate that the cataract surgery could directly influence intraocular pressure variation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document