Multi-Trace Semi-blind Nonstationary Deconvolution

Author(s):  
H. Chen ◽  
J.H. Gao ◽  
S.A. S
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 1195-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongling Chen ◽  
Jinghuai Gao ◽  
Naihao Liu ◽  
Yang Yang

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang Li ◽  
Shou-Dong Wang ◽  
Xiao-Hong Chen ◽  
Guo-Chang Liu ◽  
Qiang Zheng

Geophysics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. S103-S110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changjun Zhang ◽  
Tadeusz J. Ulrych

In seismic exploration, received seismic signals usually experience absorption during their propagation. However, seismic migration algorithms seldom take into account seismic absorption in their implementations. We have investigated the blurring effect in migrated images that occurs when using a regular migration algorithm to migrate those seismic data with absorption. The blurring functions can be calculated using a numerical method; and for layered media, a fast algorithm exists for updating the blurring function from one time step to another. The deblurring process is formulated as a problem of multidimensional nonstationary deconvolution. We use a least-squares inverse scheme to remove the absorption blurring effect and in turn refocus migrated images. The refocusing algorithm is stable, and convergence is achieved with a few iterations at each wavenumber. Experiments on synthetic and real data show that our refocusing technique is valid when compensating for seismic absorption after migration.


Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. R221-R234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhan Sui ◽  
Jianwei Ma

Seismic wavelet estimation and deconvolution are essential for high-resolution seismic processing. Because of the influence of absorption and scattering, the frequency and phase of the seismic wavelet change with time during wave propagation, leading to a time-varying seismic wavelet. To obtain reflectivity coefficients with more accurate relative amplitudes, we should compute a nonstationary deconvolution of this seismogram, which might be difficult to solve. We have extended sparse spike deconvolution via Toeplitz-sparse matrix factorization to a nonstationary sparse spike deconvolution approach with anelastic attenuation. We do this by separating our model into subproblems in each of which the wavelet estimation problem is solved by the classic sparse optimization algorithms. We find numerical examples that illustrate the parameter setting, noisy seismogram, and the estimation error of the [Formula: see text] value to validate the effectiveness of our extended approach. More importantly, taking advantage of the high accuracy of the estimated [Formula: see text] value, we obtain better performance than with the stationary Toeplitz-sparse spike deconvolution approach in real seismic data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document